


Improving Request, Validation, and Response Handling in Go Microservices
Nov 21, 2024 am 09:21 AMThis guide explains how I streamlined the handling of requests, validations, and responses in my Go microservices, aiming for simplicity, reusability, and a more maintainable codebase.
Introduction
I've been working with microservices in Go for quite some time, and I always appreciate the clarity and simplicity that this language offers. One of the things I love most about Go is that nothing happens behind the scenes; the code is always transparent and predictable.
However, some parts of development can be quite tedious, especially when it comes to validating and standardizing responses in API endpoints. I have tried many different approaches to tackle this, but recently, while writing my Go course, I came up with a rather unexpected idea. This idea added a touch of “magic” to my handlers, and, to my surprise, I liked it. With this solution, I was able to centralize all the logic for validation, decoding, and parameter parsing of requests, as well as unify the encoding and responses for the APIs. In the end, I found a balance between maintaining code clarity and reducing repetitive implementations.
The Problem
When developing Go microservices, one common task is handling incoming HTTP requests efficiently. This process typically involves parsing request bodies, extracting parameters, validating the data, and sending back consistent responses. Let me illustrate the problem with an example:
package main import ( "encoding/json" "github.com/go-chi/chi/v5" "github.com/go-chi/chi/v5/middleware" "github.com/go-playground/validator/v10" "log" "net/http" ) type SampleRequest struct { Name string `json:"name" validate:"required,min=3"` Age int `json:"age" validate:"required,min=1"` } var validate = validator.New() type ValidationErrors struct { Errors map[string][]string `json:"errors"` } func main() { r := chi.NewRouter() r.Use(middleware.Logger) r.Use(middleware.Recoverer) r.Post("/submit/{name}", func(w http.ResponseWriter, r *http.Request) { sampleReq := &SampleRequest{} // Set the path parameter name := chi.URLParam(r, "name") if name == "" { w.WriteHeader(http.StatusBadRequest) json.NewEncoder(w).Encode(map[string]interface{}{ "code": http.StatusBadRequest, "message": "name is required", }) return } sampleReq.Name = name // Parse and decode the JSON body if err := json.NewDecoder(r.Body).Decode(sampleReq); err != nil { w.WriteHeader(http.StatusBadRequest) json.NewEncoder(w).Encode(map[string]interface{}{ "code": http.StatusBadRequest, "message": "Invalid JSON format", }) return } // Validate the request if err := validate.Struct(sampleReq); err != nil { validationErrors := make(map[string][]string) for _, err := range err.(validator.ValidationErrors) { fieldName := err.Field() validationErrors[fieldName] = append(validationErrors[fieldName], err.Tag()) } w.WriteHeader(http.StatusBadRequest) json.NewEncoder(w).Encode(map[string]interface{}{ "code": http.StatusBadRequest, "message": "Validation error", "body": ValidationErrors{Errors: validationErrors}, }) return } // Send success response w.WriteHeader(http.StatusOK) json.NewEncoder(w).Encode(map[string]interface{}{ "code": http.StatusOK, "message": "Request received successfully", "body": sampleReq, }) }) log.Println("Starting server on :8080") http.ListenAndServe(":8080", r) }
Let me explain the code above, focusing at the handler part where we manually handle:
- Handles path parameters: Verify if the required path parameters exists and handles it.
- Decoding the request body: Ensuring that the incoming JSON is parsed correctly.
- Validation: Using the validator package to check if the request fields meet the requirement criteria.
- Error handling: Responding to the client with appropriate error messages when validation fails or JSON is malformed.
- Consistent responses: Manually building a response structure.
While the code is functional, it involves a significant amount of boilerplate logic that must be repeated for each new endpoint, making it harder to maintain and prone to inconsistencies.
So, how can we improve this?
Breaking down the code
To address this issues and improve the code maintainability, I decided to split the logic into three distinct layers: Request, Response, and Validation. This approach encapsulates the logic for each part, making it reusable and easier to test independently.
Request Layer
The Request layer is responsible for parsing and extracting data from the incoming HTTP requests. By isolating this logic, we can standardize how data is processed and ensure that all parsing is handled uniformly.
Validation Layer
The Validation layer focuses solely on validating the parsed data according to predefined rules. This keeps validation logic separate from request handling, making it more maintainable and reusable across different endpoints.
Response Layer
The Response layer handler the construction and formatting of responses. By centralizing response logic, we can ensure that all API responses follow a consistent structure, simplifying debugging and improving client interactions.
So… Although splitting the code into layers offers benefits like reusability, testability, and maintainability, it comes with some trade-offs. Increased complexity can make the project structure harder for new developers to grasp, and for simple endpoints, using separate layers might feel excessive, potentially leading to over-engineering. Understanding these pros and cons helps in deciding when to apply this pattern effectively.
At the end of the day, is always about what is bothering you most. Right? So, now lets put some hand in our old code and start to implement the layers mentioned above.
Refactoring the code into layers
Step 1: Creating the Request Layer
First, we refactor the code to encapsulate request parsing into a dedicated function or module. This layer focuses solely on reading and parsing the request body, ensuring that it is decoupled from other responsibilities in the handler.
Create a new file httpsuite/request.go:
package main import ( "encoding/json" "github.com/go-chi/chi/v5" "github.com/go-chi/chi/v5/middleware" "github.com/go-playground/validator/v10" "log" "net/http" ) type SampleRequest struct { Name string `json:"name" validate:"required,min=3"` Age int `json:"age" validate:"required,min=1"` } var validate = validator.New() type ValidationErrors struct { Errors map[string][]string `json:"errors"` } func main() { r := chi.NewRouter() r.Use(middleware.Logger) r.Use(middleware.Recoverer) r.Post("/submit/{name}", func(w http.ResponseWriter, r *http.Request) { sampleReq := &SampleRequest{} // Set the path parameter name := chi.URLParam(r, "name") if name == "" { w.WriteHeader(http.StatusBadRequest) json.NewEncoder(w).Encode(map[string]interface{}{ "code": http.StatusBadRequest, "message": "name is required", }) return } sampleReq.Name = name // Parse and decode the JSON body if err := json.NewDecoder(r.Body).Decode(sampleReq); err != nil { w.WriteHeader(http.StatusBadRequest) json.NewEncoder(w).Encode(map[string]interface{}{ "code": http.StatusBadRequest, "message": "Invalid JSON format", }) return } // Validate the request if err := validate.Struct(sampleReq); err != nil { validationErrors := make(map[string][]string) for _, err := range err.(validator.ValidationErrors) { fieldName := err.Field() validationErrors[fieldName] = append(validationErrors[fieldName], err.Tag()) } w.WriteHeader(http.StatusBadRequest) json.NewEncoder(w).Encode(map[string]interface{}{ "code": http.StatusBadRequest, "message": "Validation error", "body": ValidationErrors{Errors: validationErrors}, }) return } // Send success response w.WriteHeader(http.StatusOK) json.NewEncoder(w).Encode(map[string]interface{}{ "code": http.StatusOK, "message": "Request received successfully", "body": sampleReq, }) }) log.Println("Starting server on :8080") http.ListenAndServe(":8080", r) }
Note: At this point, I had to use reflection. Probably I'm way to stupid to find a better wait do do it. ?
Of course, that we can also test this, create the test file httpsuite/request_test.go:
package httpsuite import ( "encoding/json" "errors" "github.com/go-chi/chi/v5" "net/http" "reflect" ) // RequestParamSetter defines the interface used to set the parameters to the HTTP request object by the request parser. // Implementing this interface allows custom handling of URL parameters. type RequestParamSetter interface { // SetParam assigns a value to a specified field in the request struct. // The fieldName parameter is the name of the field, and value is the value to set. SetParam(fieldName, value string) error } // ParseRequest parses the incoming HTTP request into a specified struct type, handling JSON decoding and URL parameters. // It validates the parsed request and returns it along with any potential errors. // The pathParams variadic argument allows specifying URL parameters to be extracted. // If an error occurs during parsing, validation, or parameter setting, it responds with an appropriate HTTP status. func ParseRequest[T RequestParamSetter](w http.ResponseWriter, r *http.Request, pathParams ...string) (T, error) { var request T var empty T defer func() { _ = r.Body.Close() }() if r.Body != http.NoBody { if err := json.NewDecoder(r.Body).Decode(&request); err != nil { SendResponse[any](w, "Invalid JSON format", http.StatusBadRequest, nil) return empty, err } } // If body wasn't parsed request may be nil and cause problems ahead if isRequestNil(request) { request = reflect.New(reflect.TypeOf(request).Elem()).Interface().(T) } // Parse URL parameters for _, key := range pathParams { value := chi.URLParam(r, key) if value == "" { SendResponse[any](w, "Parameter "+key+" not found in request", http.StatusBadRequest, nil) return empty, errors.New("missing parameter: " + key) } if err := request.SetParam(key, value); err != nil { SendResponse[any](w, "Failed to set field "+key, http.StatusInternalServerError, nil) return empty, err } } // Validate the combined request struct if validationErr := IsRequestValid(request); validationErr != nil { SendResponse[ValidationErrors](w, "Validation error", http.StatusBadRequest, validationErr) return empty, errors.New("validation error") } return request, nil } func isRequestNil(i interface{}) bool { return i == nil || (reflect.ValueOf(i).Kind() == reflect.Ptr && reflect.ValueOf(i).IsNil()) }
As you can see, the Request layer uses the Validation layer. However, I still want to keep the layers separated in the code, not only to make it easier to maintain, but 'cause I may also want to use the validation layer isolated.
Depending on the needs, in the future, I may decide to keep all the layers isolated and allowing its co-dependency by using some interfaces.
Step 2: Implementing the Validation Layer
Once the request parsing is separated, we create a standalone validation function or module that handles the validation logic. By isolating this logic, we can easily test it and apply consistent validation rules across multiple endpoints.
For that, let's create the httpsuite/validation.go file:
package main import ( "encoding/json" "github.com/go-chi/chi/v5" "github.com/go-chi/chi/v5/middleware" "github.com/go-playground/validator/v10" "log" "net/http" ) type SampleRequest struct { Name string `json:"name" validate:"required,min=3"` Age int `json:"age" validate:"required,min=1"` } var validate = validator.New() type ValidationErrors struct { Errors map[string][]string `json:"errors"` } func main() { r := chi.NewRouter() r.Use(middleware.Logger) r.Use(middleware.Recoverer) r.Post("/submit/{name}", func(w http.ResponseWriter, r *http.Request) { sampleReq := &SampleRequest{} // Set the path parameter name := chi.URLParam(r, "name") if name == "" { w.WriteHeader(http.StatusBadRequest) json.NewEncoder(w).Encode(map[string]interface{}{ "code": http.StatusBadRequest, "message": "name is required", }) return } sampleReq.Name = name // Parse and decode the JSON body if err := json.NewDecoder(r.Body).Decode(sampleReq); err != nil { w.WriteHeader(http.StatusBadRequest) json.NewEncoder(w).Encode(map[string]interface{}{ "code": http.StatusBadRequest, "message": "Invalid JSON format", }) return } // Validate the request if err := validate.Struct(sampleReq); err != nil { validationErrors := make(map[string][]string) for _, err := range err.(validator.ValidationErrors) { fieldName := err.Field() validationErrors[fieldName] = append(validationErrors[fieldName], err.Tag()) } w.WriteHeader(http.StatusBadRequest) json.NewEncoder(w).Encode(map[string]interface{}{ "code": http.StatusBadRequest, "message": "Validation error", "body": ValidationErrors{Errors: validationErrors}, }) return } // Send success response w.WriteHeader(http.StatusOK) json.NewEncoder(w).Encode(map[string]interface{}{ "code": http.StatusOK, "message": "Request received successfully", "body": sampleReq, }) }) log.Println("Starting server on :8080") http.ListenAndServe(":8080", r) }
Now, create the test file httpsuite/validation_test.go:
package httpsuite import ( "encoding/json" "errors" "github.com/go-chi/chi/v5" "net/http" "reflect" ) // RequestParamSetter defines the interface used to set the parameters to the HTTP request object by the request parser. // Implementing this interface allows custom handling of URL parameters. type RequestParamSetter interface { // SetParam assigns a value to a specified field in the request struct. // The fieldName parameter is the name of the field, and value is the value to set. SetParam(fieldName, value string) error } // ParseRequest parses the incoming HTTP request into a specified struct type, handling JSON decoding and URL parameters. // It validates the parsed request and returns it along with any potential errors. // The pathParams variadic argument allows specifying URL parameters to be extracted. // If an error occurs during parsing, validation, or parameter setting, it responds with an appropriate HTTP status. func ParseRequest[T RequestParamSetter](w http.ResponseWriter, r *http.Request, pathParams ...string) (T, error) { var request T var empty T defer func() { _ = r.Body.Close() }() if r.Body != http.NoBody { if err := json.NewDecoder(r.Body).Decode(&request); err != nil { SendResponse[any](w, "Invalid JSON format", http.StatusBadRequest, nil) return empty, err } } // If body wasn't parsed request may be nil and cause problems ahead if isRequestNil(request) { request = reflect.New(reflect.TypeOf(request).Elem()).Interface().(T) } // Parse URL parameters for _, key := range pathParams { value := chi.URLParam(r, key) if value == "" { SendResponse[any](w, "Parameter "+key+" not found in request", http.StatusBadRequest, nil) return empty, errors.New("missing parameter: " + key) } if err := request.SetParam(key, value); err != nil { SendResponse[any](w, "Failed to set field "+key, http.StatusInternalServerError, nil) return empty, err } } // Validate the combined request struct if validationErr := IsRequestValid(request); validationErr != nil { SendResponse[ValidationErrors](w, "Validation error", http.StatusBadRequest, validationErr) return empty, errors.New("validation error") } return request, nil } func isRequestNil(i interface{}) bool { return i == nil || (reflect.ValueOf(i).Kind() == reflect.Ptr && reflect.ValueOf(i).IsNil()) }
Step 3: Building the Response Layer
Finally, we refactor the response construction into a separate module. This ensures that all responses follow a consistent format, making it simpler to manage and debug responses throughout the application.
Create the file httpsuite/response.go:
package httpsuite import ( "bytes" "context" "encoding/json" "errors" "fmt" "github.com/go-chi/chi/v5" "github.com/stretchr/testify/assert" "log" "net/http" "net/http/httptest" "strconv" "strings" "testing" ) // TestRequest includes custom type annotation for UUID type TestRequest struct { ID int `json:"id" validate:"required"` Name string `json:"name" validate:"required"` } func (r *TestRequest) SetParam(fieldName, value string) error { switch strings.ToLower(fieldName) { case "id": id, err := strconv.Atoi(value) if err != nil { return errors.New("invalid id") } r.ID = id default: log.Printf("Parameter %s cannot be set", fieldName) } return nil } func Test_ParseRequest(t *testing.T) { testSetURLParam := func(r *http.Request, fieldName, value string) *http.Request { ctx := chi.NewRouteContext() ctx.URLParams.Add(fieldName, value) return r.WithContext(context.WithValue(r.Context(), chi.RouteCtxKey, ctx)) } type args struct { w http.ResponseWriter r *http.Request pathParams []string } type testCase[T any] struct { name string args args want *TestRequest wantErr assert.ErrorAssertionFunc } tests := []testCase[TestRequest]{ { name: "Successful Request", args: args{ w: httptest.NewRecorder(), r: func() *http.Request { body, _ := json.Marshal(TestRequest{Name: "Test"}) req := httptest.NewRequest("POST", "/test/123", bytes.NewBuffer(body)) req = testSetURLParam(req, "ID", "123") req.Header.Set("Content-Type", "application/json") return req }(), pathParams: []string{"ID"}, }, want: &TestRequest{ID: 123, Name: "Test"}, wantErr: assert.NoError, }, { name: "Missing body", args: args{ w: httptest.NewRecorder(), r: func() *http.Request { req := httptest.NewRequest("POST", "/test/123", nil) req = testSetURLParam(req, "ID", "123") req.Header.Set("Content-Type", "application/json") return req }(), pathParams: []string{"ID"}, }, want: nil, wantErr: assert.Error, }, { name: "Missing Path Parameter", args: args{ w: httptest.NewRecorder(), r: func() *http.Request { req := httptest.NewRequest("POST", "/test", nil) req.Header.Set("Content-Type", "application/json") return req }(), pathParams: []string{"ID"}, }, want: nil, wantErr: assert.Error, }, { name: "Invalid JSON Body", args: args{ w: httptest.NewRecorder(), r: func() *http.Request { req := httptest.NewRequest("POST", "/test/123", bytes.NewBufferString("{invalid-json}")) req = testSetURLParam(req, "ID", "123") req.Header.Set("Content-Type", "application/json") return req }(), pathParams: []string{"ID"}, }, want: nil, wantErr: assert.Error, }, { name: "Validation Error for body", args: args{ w: httptest.NewRecorder(), r: func() *http.Request { body, _ := json.Marshal(TestRequest{}) req := httptest.NewRequest("POST", "/test/123", bytes.NewBuffer(body)) req = testSetURLParam(req, "ID", "123") req.Header.Set("Content-Type", "application/json") return req }(), pathParams: []string{"ID"}, }, want: nil, wantErr: assert.Error, }, { name: "Validation Error for zero ID", args: args{ w: httptest.NewRecorder(), r: func() *http.Request { body, _ := json.Marshal(TestRequest{Name: "Test"}) req := httptest.NewRequest("POST", "/test/0", bytes.NewBuffer(body)) req = testSetURLParam(req, "ID", "0") req.Header.Set("Content-Type", "application/json") return req }(), pathParams: []string{"ID"}, }, want: nil, wantErr: assert.Error, }, } for _, tt := range tests { t.Run(tt.name, func(t *testing.T) { got, err := ParseRequest[*TestRequest](tt.args.w, tt.args.r, tt.args.pathParams...) if !tt.wantErr(t, err, fmt.Sprintf("parseRequest(%v, %v, %v)", tt.args.w, tt.args.r, tt.args.pathParams)) { return } assert.Equalf(t, tt.want, got, "parseRequest(%v, %v, %v)", tt.args.w, tt.args.r, tt.args.pathParams) }) } }
Create the test file httpsuite/response_test.go:
package httpsuite import ( "errors" "github.com/go-playground/validator/v10" ) // ValidationErrors represents a collection of validation errors for an HTTP request. type ValidationErrors struct { Errors map[string][]string `json:"errors,omitempty"` } // NewValidationErrors creates a new ValidationErrors instance from a given error. // It extracts field-specific validation errors and maps them for structured output. func NewValidationErrors(err error) *ValidationErrors { var validationErrors validator.ValidationErrors errors.As(err, &validationErrors) fieldErrors := make(map[string][]string) for _, vErr := range validationErrors { fieldName := vErr.Field() fieldError := fieldName + " " + vErr.Tag() fieldErrors[fieldName] = append(fieldErrors[fieldName], fieldError) } return &ValidationErrors{Errors: fieldErrors} } // IsRequestValid validates the provided request struct using the go-playground/validator package. // It returns a ValidationErrors instance if validation fails, or nil if the request is valid. func IsRequestValid(request any) *ValidationErrors { validate := validator.New(validator.WithRequiredStructEnabled()) err := validate.Struct(request) if err != nil { return NewValidationErrors(err) } return nil }
Each step of this refactoring allows us to simplify the handler logic by delegating specific responsibilities to well-defined layers. While I won’t show the complete code at every step, these changes involve moving parsing, validation, and response logic into their respective functions or files.
Refactoring the example code
Now, what we need is to change the old code to use the layers and let’s see how it will look like.
package httpsuite import ( "github.com/go-playground/validator/v10" "testing" "github.com/stretchr/testify/assert" ) type TestValidationRequest struct { Name string `validate:"required"` Age int `validate:"required,min=18"` } func TestNewValidationErrors(t *testing.T) { validate := validator.New() request := TestValidationRequest{} // Missing required fields to trigger validation errors err := validate.Struct(request) if err == nil { t.Fatal("Expected validation errors, but got none") } validationErrors := NewValidationErrors(err) expectedErrors := map[string][]string{ "Name": {"Name required"}, "Age": {"Age required"}, } assert.Equal(t, expectedErrors, validationErrors.Errors) } func TestIsRequestValid(t *testing.T) { tests := []struct { name string request TestValidationRequest expectedErrors *ValidationErrors }{ { name: "Valid request", request: TestValidationRequest{Name: "Alice", Age: 25}, expectedErrors: nil, // No errors expected for valid input }, { name: "Missing Name and Age below minimum", request: TestValidationRequest{Age: 17}, expectedErrors: &ValidationErrors{ Errors: map[string][]string{ "Name": {"Name required"}, "Age": {"Age min"}, }, }, }, { name: "Missing Age", request: TestValidationRequest{Name: "Alice"}, expectedErrors: &ValidationErrors{ Errors: map[string][]string{ "Age": {"Age required"}, }, }, }, } for _, tt := range tests { t.Run(tt.name, func(t *testing.T) { errs := IsRequestValid(tt.request) if tt.expectedErrors == nil { assert.Nil(t, errs) } else { assert.NotNil(t, errs) assert.Equal(t, tt.expectedErrors.Errors, errs.Errors) } }) } }
By refactoring the handler code into layers for request parsing, validation, and response formatting, we have successfully removed the repetitive logic that was previously embedded within the handler itself. This modular approach not only improves readability but also enhances maintainability and testability by keeping each responsibility focused and reusable. With the handler now simplified, developers can easily understand and modify specific layers without affecting the entire flow, creating a cleaner, more scalable codebase.
Conclusion
I hope this step-by-step guide on structuring your Go microservices with dedicated request, validation, and response layers has provided insight into creating cleaner and more maintainable code. I’d love to hear your thoughts about this approach. Am I missing something important? How would you extend or improve this idea in your own projects?
I encourage you to explore the source code and use httpsuite directly in your projects. You can find the library in the rluders/httpsuite repository. Your feedback and contributions would be invaluable to make this library even more robust and useful for the Go community.
See you all in the next one.
The above is the detailed content of Improving Request, Validation, and Response Handling in Go Microservices. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!

Hot AI Tools

Undress AI Tool
Undress images for free

Undresser.AI Undress
AI-powered app for creating realistic nude photos

AI Clothes Remover
Online AI tool for removing clothes from photos.

Clothoff.io
AI clothes remover

Video Face Swap
Swap faces in any video effortlessly with our completely free AI face swap tool!

Hot Article

Hot Tools

Notepad++7.3.1
Easy-to-use and free code editor

SublimeText3 Chinese version
Chinese version, very easy to use

Zend Studio 13.0.1
Powerful PHP integrated development environment

Dreamweaver CS6
Visual web development tools

SublimeText3 Mac version
God-level code editing software (SublimeText3)

Golang is mainly used for back-end development, but it can also play an indirect role in the front-end field. Its design goals focus on high-performance, concurrent processing and system-level programming, and are suitable for building back-end applications such as API servers, microservices, distributed systems, database operations and CLI tools. Although Golang is not the mainstream language for web front-end, it can be compiled into JavaScript through GopherJS, run on WebAssembly through TinyGo, or generate HTML pages with a template engine to participate in front-end development. However, modern front-end development still needs to rely on JavaScript/TypeScript and its ecosystem. Therefore, Golang is more suitable for the technology stack selection with high-performance backend as the core.

To build a GraphQLAPI in Go, it is recommended to use the gqlgen library to improve development efficiency. 1. First select the appropriate library, such as gqlgen, which supports automatic code generation based on schema; 2. Then define GraphQLschema, describe the API structure and query portal, such as defining Post types and query methods; 3. Then initialize the project and generate basic code to implement business logic in resolver; 4. Finally, connect GraphQLhandler to HTTPserver and test the API through the built-in Playground. Notes include field naming specifications, error handling, performance optimization and security settings to ensure project maintenance

The key to installing Go is to select the correct version, configure environment variables, and verify the installation. 1. Go to the official website to download the installation package of the corresponding system. Windows uses .msi files, macOS uses .pkg files, Linux uses .tar.gz files and unzip them to /usr/local directory; 2. Configure environment variables, edit ~/.bashrc or ~/.zshrc in Linux/macOS to add PATH and GOPATH, and Windows set PATH to Go in the system properties; 3. Use the government command to verify the installation, and run the test program hello.go to confirm that the compilation and execution are normal. PATH settings and loops throughout the process

sync.WaitGroup is used to wait for a group of goroutines to complete the task. Its core is to work together through three methods: Add, Done, and Wait. 1.Add(n) Set the number of goroutines to wait; 2.Done() is called at the end of each goroutine, and the count is reduced by one; 3.Wait() blocks the main coroutine until all tasks are completed. When using it, please note: Add should be called outside the goroutine, avoid duplicate Wait, and be sure to ensure that Don is called. It is recommended to use it with defer. It is common in concurrent crawling of web pages, batch data processing and other scenarios, and can effectively control the concurrency process.

The core of audio and video processing lies in understanding the basic process and optimization methods. 1. The basic process includes acquisition, encoding, transmission, decoding and playback, and each link has technical difficulties; 2. Common problems such as audio and video aberration, lag delay, sound noise, blurred picture, etc. can be solved through synchronous adjustment, coding optimization, noise reduction module, parameter adjustment, etc.; 3. It is recommended to use FFmpeg, OpenCV, WebRTC, GStreamer and other tools to achieve functions; 4. In terms of performance management, we should pay attention to hardware acceleration, reasonable setting of resolution frame rates, control concurrency and memory leakage problems. Mastering these key points will help improve development efficiency and user experience.

Using Go's embed package can easily embed static resources into binary, suitable for web services to package HTML, CSS, pictures and other files. 1. Declare the embedded resource to add //go:embed comment before the variable, such as embedding a single file hello.txt; 2. It can be embedded in the entire directory such as static/*, and realize multi-file packaging through embed.FS; 3. It is recommended to switch the disk loading mode through buildtag or environment variables to improve efficiency; 4. Pay attention to path accuracy, file size limitations and read-only characteristics of embedded resources. Rational use of embed can simplify deployment and optimize project structure.

It is not difficult to build a web server written in Go. The core lies in using the net/http package to implement basic services. 1. Use net/http to start the simplest server: register processing functions and listen to ports through a few lines of code; 2. Routing management: Use ServeMux to organize multiple interface paths for easy structured management; 3. Common practices: group routing by functional modules, and use third-party libraries to support complex matching; 4. Static file service: provide HTML, CSS and JS files through http.FileServer; 5. Performance and security: enable HTTPS, limit the size of the request body, and set timeout to improve security and performance. After mastering these key points, it will be easier to expand functionality.

The purpose of select plus default is to allow select to perform default behavior when no other branches are ready to avoid program blocking. 1. When receiving data from the channel without blocking, if the channel is empty, it will directly enter the default branch; 2. In combination with time. After or ticker, try to send data regularly. If the channel is full, it will not block and skip; 3. Prevent deadlocks, avoid program stuck when uncertain whether the channel is closed; when using it, please note that the default branch will be executed immediately and cannot be abused, and default and case are mutually exclusive and will not be executed at the same time.
