Use embedding when the relationship is one-to-few, data is accessed together, and fast reads are needed; 2. Use referencing when dealing with one-to-many or many-to-many relationships, large or independently queried data; 3. Consider read/write frequency, data growth, independent queries, and atomicity needs; 4. Apply a hybrid approach when balancing performance and flexibility, such as embedding summaries while referencing full details in separate collections to optimize both speed and scalability.

When working with MongoDB—a document-oriented database—one of the most important design decisions you’ll face is how to model relationships between data. Unlike relational databases, MongoDB doesn’t enforce joins or foreign keys, so you need to choose between embedding and referencing based on your use case.

Here’s how to decide which approach works best for your app:

? When to Use Embedding (Denormalized Data)

Embed documents when:

• The relationship is one-to-few (e.g., a blog post with a few comments).
• The embedded data is always used together with the parent (e.g., user profile address).
• You want fast reads and don’t need to query the child data independently.

Example:

{
  "_id": ObjectId("..."),
  "title": "My Post",
  "author": "Alice",
  "comments": [
    { "user": "Bob", "text": "Great post!" },
    { "user": "Charlie", "text": "Thanks for sharing." }
  ]
}

Pros:

• Single query to fetch everything.
• Atomic updates (if using transactions or single-document writes).
• Simpler application logic.

Cons:

• Can hit the 16MB document size limit if arrays grow too large.
• Harder to query or update individual embedded items independently.

? When to Use Referencing (Normalized Data)

Use references when:

• The relationship is one-to-many or many-to-many (e.g., users ?? orders ?? products).
• Child documents are large or frequently updated separately.
• You need to query or index the related data on its own.

Example:

// Order document
{
  "_id": ObjectId("..."),
  "userId": ObjectId("user123"),
  "items": [
    { "productId": ObjectId("prod456"), "quantity": 2 }
  ]
}

// Product document (separate collection)
{
  "_id": ObjectId("prod456"),
  "name": "Laptop",
  "price": 999
}

Pros:

• Scales better for large or dynamic datasets.
• Easier to maintain consistency across related data.
• Supports efficient indexing and querying on referenced fields.

Cons:

• Requires multiple queries or application-level joins (e.g., using $lookup in aggregation).
• No atomicity across documents unless using multi-document transactions (which add complexity).

? Key Questions to Ask

Before choosing, consider:

• How often will this data be read vs. written?

  • Read-heavy? → Embed.
  • Write-heavy or shared? → Reference.

• Will the related data grow indefinitely?

  • Yes? → Reference (to avoid hitting document size limits).

• Do you need to query the child data independently?

  • Yes? → Reference.

• Is atomicity critical for updates across related data?

  • Yes? → Embed (or use transactions with references).

? Pro Tip: Hybrid Approach

Sometimes, a mix works best. For example:

• Embed a summary (like productName, price) in the order for fast reads.
• Keep full product details in a separate collection for updates and deep queries.

This balances performance and flexibility—common in real-world apps like e-commerce platforms.

Basically, there’s no one-size-fits-all. Think about your queries, data growth, and update patterns. Start simple (often embedding), then normalize as complexity grows.

The above is the detailed content of Handling Complex Relationships in MongoDB: Embedding vs. Referencing. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!