MySQL itself does not support the Serverless architecture, but cloud manufacturers such as AWS and Alibaba Cloud have launched Serverless MySQL products, which can automatically scale and on-demand billing by encapsulating underlying resources. Suitable scenarios include: 1. Applications with large fluctuations in access volume, which can automatically expand and save resources; 2. Small project or MVP prototype development to reduce initial cost and operation and maintenance complexity; 3. Event-driven applications, coordinated with function calculation to achieve elastic access. When using it, you need to pay attention to cold start delay, concurrency restrictions, long-term high load costs and cross-region delay issues. Compatibility, scaling strategy, cold start time, cost transparency and operation and maintenance functions should be evaluated when selecting a plan.

MySQL is not a database that naturally supports Serverless architecture, but with the development of cloud services, some manufacturers (such as AWS, Alibaba Cloud, etc.) have launched products in the form of "Serverless MySQL". These products enable automatic scaling and billing on demand by encapsulating underlying resource management, allowing developers to focus more on business logic rather than infrastructure maintenance.

If you are considering using Serverless MySQL or want to know the scenarios it applies to, here are some practical information and suggestions.

What is Serverless MySQL?

The so-called "Serverless MySQL" does not mean that there is no server, but that you do not need to care about the configuration, expansion, maintenance and other issues of the underlying server. The cloud platform will automatically process these tasks and dynamically allocate and bill resources based on actual usage (such as the number of connections, query volume, storage space, etc.).

Common examples include:

• AWS Aurora Serverless
• Alibaba Cloud PolarDB Serverless
• On-demand instances of Google Cloud SQL (although not completely Serverless, but have similar features)

This type of database is usually compatible with the native MySQL protocol and has a low migration cost.

Suitable for Serverless MySQL scenarios

1. Applications with large fluctuations in visits

If your application traffic is unstable, such as only a few hours of peak hours a day, or some functional modules are called occasionally, then traditional fixed-specification databases can easily cause resource waste or performance bottlenecks.

Using Serverless MySQL can do:

• Automatic expansion
• Pay by actual use
• No need to estimate the peak capacity

For example: an e-commerce promotion system has almost no access to it during non-promotion periods, but it suddenly surges during a big promotion. At this time, the Serverless database can respond well to this change of demand.

2. Small project or MVP prototype development

For start-up projects, internal tools, or individual projects, there may not be much budget to maintain the database cluster in the early stage. Serverless MySQL provides a low-threshold access method:

• No need to buy an instance in advance
• Billed by quantity, cost controllable
• Simple management, saving operation and maintenance time

This model is particularly suitable for products in the early stage of verification, and it is not too late to migrate to the standard architecture after the scale is increased.

3. Event-driven application

For example, applications built on function calculations (such as AWS Lambda and Alibaba Cloud function calculations), each request may trigger database operations, but the overall load is not high and uncertain.

Under this architecture:

• The database should be able to respond quickly to short-term and high-frequency access
• Avoid fees caused by long-term idleness
• Supports elastic connection and concurrent control

Serverless MySQL can work well with this type of serverless backend architecture.

Issues to note when using Serverless MySQL

Although convenient, Serverless MySQL is not suitable for all scenarios. Here are a few things to note:

• Cold startup delay : If the database is not accessed for a long time, it may enter a dormant state, and there will be a certain delay in wake-up again.
• Maximum concurrency limit : Different cloud vendors have different upper limits on the number of connections and QPS, which may affect performance.
• Long-term high load costs are not necessarily lower : if your application is running at full capacity, traditional reserved instances are more cost-effective.
• Cross-region access latency : Some Serverless databases cannot be deployed on the local VPC, and network latency must be evaluated clearly.

How to choose the right Serverless MySQL solution?

If you decide to try, you can evaluate it from the following aspects:

• Is it compatible with the currently used MySQL version?
• Is the automatic scaling strategy flexible? Can the minimum/maximum capacity be set?
• Is the cold start time acceptable?
• Is the cost model transparent? Are there any hidden fees?
• Are there any functions such as logging, monitoring, and backup?

You can start with small-scale testing, observe the performance in actual use, and then decide whether to adopt it on a large scale.

Basically that's it. Serverless MySQL is a trend, especially suitable for lightweight, highly volatile or fast iterative projects. Although there are still some limitations, its flexibility and cost advantages are attracting more and more developers.

The above is the detailed content of MySQL Serverless Architectures and Use Cases. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!