Maven is ideal for standardized, enterprise environments with its XML-based, convention-over-configuration approach, while 2. Gradle excels in flexibility and performance using Groovy or Kotlin DSL, making it better for complex, large-scale, or Android projects, 3. both support robust dependency management but Gradle offers more granular control and faster builds via incremental execution, and 4. the choice depends on project needs: use Maven for simplicity and stability, Gradle for customization and speed, with easy migration possible via gradle init --type pom, ensuring both remain viable for modern Java development.

Modern Java development relies heavily on efficient build automation and dependency management to streamline development, testing, and deployment. Two of the most widely used tools for this purpose are Maven and Gradle. While both serve similar goals—managing dependencies, compiling code, running tests, and packaging applications—they take different approaches in terms of syntax, performance, and flexibility.

Let’s break down how each tool works in a modern context and when you might choose one over the other.

1. Apache Maven: Convention Over Configuration

Maven has long been the standard for Java projects. It follows the principle of "convention over configuration", meaning it assumes sensible defaults so developers don’t need to specify every detail.

Key Features:

• Declarative builds using XML (pom.xml)
• Strong standardization: predefined directory structure and lifecycle phases (compile, test, package, install, deploy)
• Vast ecosystem with thousands of libraries available via Maven Central
• Deterministic builds due to strict structure

Example pom.xml snippet:

<project>
  <modelVersion>4.0.0</modelVersion>
  <groupId>com.example</groupId>
  <artifactId>my-app</artifactId>
  <version>1.0.0</version>

  <dependencies>
    <dependency>
      <groupId>org.springframework.boot</groupId>
      <artifactId>spring-boot-starter-web</artifactId>
      <version>3.1.0</version>
    </dependency>
  </dependencies>
</project>

When to Use Maven:

• You value consistency and standardization across teams
• Working in enterprise environments where tooling stability is critical
• Prefer a mature, well-documented system with broad IDE support
• Don’t want to customize the build process much

Maven is predictable and easy to get started with, but its rigidity and verbose XML format can become limiting for complex builds.

2. Gradle: Flexibility and Performance

Gradle combines the best ideas from Maven and Ant but uses a domain-specific language (DSL) based on Groovy or Kotlin for configuration. This makes builds more expressive and customizable.

Key Features:

• Groovy or Kotlin DSL (e.g., build.gradle or build.gradle.kts) – more readable than XML
• Incremental builds and build caching for faster execution
• Highly customizable build logic
• Supports multi-project builds efficiently
• Official build tool for Android

Example build.gradle.kts (Kotlin DSL):

plugins {
    java
    application
}

repositories {
    mavenCentral()
}

dependencies {
    implementation("org.springframework.boot:spring-boot-starter-web:3.1.0")
    testImplementation("junit:junit:4.13.2")
}

application {
    mainClass.set("com.example.Main")
}

When to Use Gradle:

• You need fine-grained control over the build process
• Building large or multi-module projects
• Want faster builds through caching and parallel execution
• Working with Android or Spring Boot (which both favor Gradle)
• Prefer cleaner, code-like build scripts

Gradle’s learning curve is steeper than Maven’s, but its flexibility and performance make it ideal for modern, complex applications.

3. Dependency Management Compared

Both tools resolve dependencies from repositories like Maven Central or private artifact servers (Nexus, Artifactory), but they differ in syntax and capabilities.

Gradle offers more nuanced dependency configurations. For example:

• implementation – dependency not exposed to consumers
• api – part of public API, passed to downstream projects

This helps reduce accidental API coupling in libraries.

4. Choosing Between Maven and Gradle

Here’s a practical guide:

• ? Use Maven if:

  • You're starting a simple or standard Java project
  • Your team values simplicity and uniformity
  • You're in an environment where tooling stability matters more than speed
  • CI/CD pipelines already rely on Maven

• ? Use Gradle if:

  • You’re building microservices, Android apps, or polyglot projects
  • You want faster builds at scale
  • You need custom tasks or complex build logic
  • You're using Spring Boot or modern frameworks that default to Gradle

In recent years, Gradle has gained significant traction in new projects due to its speed and expressive power—even some large Maven-based projects have migrated to Gradle.

Final Thoughts

While Maven remains a solid, reliable choice for straightforward builds, Gradle is increasingly becoming the go-to for modern Java development thanks to its performance, flexibility, and rich plugin ecosystem.

The good news? You don’t have to fully commit to one forever. Tools like init plugins allow converting Maven projects to Gradle easily:

gradle init --type pom

Whether you choose Maven or Gradle, both integrate well with IDEs (IntelliJ, Eclipse), CI/CD systems (Jenkins, GitHub Actions), and cloud-native tooling. The key is picking the right tool for your project’s scope, team expertise, and long-term maintenance needs.

Basically, Maven gives you rails; Gradle gives you a toolkit. Choose based on how much you need to build off the beaten path.

The above is the detailed content of Modern Java Build and Dependency Management with Maven and Gradle. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!