The reason why Go's concurrency model is more efficient and easy to use is that it uses lightweight goroutine instead of operating system threads. 1. The initial stack of goroutine is only 2KB, which can be dynamically scaled and supports running tens of thousands or even millions of concurrent tasks at the same time; 2. Go uses the M:N scheduling model to map M goroutines to N operating system threads to achieve a balance between parallelism and efficiency; 3. Communication through channels instead of sharing memory, reducing the risk of competition and deadlock; 4. Developers only need to use the go keyword to start goroutine, and the runtime automatically manages scheduling, stack growth and load balancing; 5. Although OS threads still have advantages in underlying system programming or scenarios that require fine control, at the application level of web servers, microservices, etc., Go's model performs better in development efficiency, scalability and maintainability, ultimately achieving high concurrency while greatly reducing complexity.

Go's concurrency model is often prayed for being more efficient and easier to work with than traditional threading models found in languages like C or Java. But what exactly makes it different—and better in many cases?

The key lies in how Go handles concurrency under the hood and the abstractions it provides to developers. Let's break it down.

Goroutines vs. OS Threads

At the heart of Go's concurrency are goroutines —lightweight, managed threads that are scheduled by Go's runtime rather than the operating system.

• Traditional threads (like pthreads in C or Thread in Java) are OS-level constructs. Each one typically comes with 1–2 MB of stack space by default and requires a system call to create and manage.
• Goroutines , on the other hand, start with a tiny stack (as small as 2KB) that grows and shrinks as needed. They're multiplexed onto a smaller number of OS threads by the Go runtime.

This means:

• You can run tens of thousands (or even millions) of goroutines simultaneously with minimal overhead.
• Creating and destroying goroutines is fast and cheap.
• Context switching between goroutines is handled in user space, which is much faster than OS thread switching.

Example: Starting 10,000 goroutines is no big deal in Go. Try doing that with OS threads, and your system will likely slow to a crawl—or run out of memory.

The M:N Scheduling Model

Go uses an M:N scheduler , meaning it maps M goroutines onto N OS threads. This is different from:

• 1:1 model (used by most threading systems), where each thread maps directly to an OS thread.
• N:1 model , where all goroutines run on a single OS thread (limits parallelism).

Go's M:N model gives you:

• Parallelism (thanks to multiple OS threads)
• Efficiency (thanks to lightweight scheduling)

The Go runtime dynamically manages:

• How many OS threads to use (controlled by GOMAXPROCS )
• When to migrate goroutines between threads
• When to preempt long-running goroutines (since Go 1.14, with cooperative preemption)

This abstraction frees developers from worrying about thread pools, context switching costs, or CPU affinity—most of the time, you just write go doSomething() and let the runtime handle the rest.

Communication via Channels, Not Shared Memory

One of Go's design philosophies is captured in the slogan:

“Do not communicate by sharing memory; instead, share memory by communicating.”

Traditional threading models rely heavily on:

• Mutexes
• Semaphores
• Condition variables
• Atomic operations

These are powerful but error-prone . Race conditions, deadlocks, and priority inversion are common pitfalls.

Go encourages a different approach using channels :

• Goroutines communicate by sending and receiving values on channels.
• Synchronization is implicit in the communication.
• It's easier to reason about data flow.

 ch := make(chan string)
go func() {
    ch <- "hello"
}()
msg := <-ch
fmt.Println(msg) // prints "hello"

While Go does support shared memory and synchronization (via sync.Mutex , atomic , etc.), the language nudges you towards safer patterns using channels and select .

Simpler Programming Model

With traditional threads, you often need to:

• Manually manage thread lifecycle
• Use thread pools to avoid overhead
• Handle errors and cleanup across threads
• Worry about stack overflows or resource exhaustion

In Go:

• go func() starts a goroutine with minimal syntax.
• Channels and sync.WaitGroup makes coordination simple.
• The runtime handles stack growth, scheduling, and load balancing.
• Built-in tools like go vet and the race detector help catch concurrency bugs.

You still need to avoid goroutine leaks or deadlocks, but overall, the model is more approachable and less error-prone for common use cases like web servers, pipelines, or background tasks.

Trade-offs and When to Use What

Go's model isn't always better:

• For low-level systems programming or maximum control, OS threads may still be preferred.
• If you're integrating with C or real-time systems, direct thread control matters.
• Very high-performance scenarios might still benefit from custom thread pools or event loops.

But for most application-level concurrency —API servers, data processing, microservices—Go's model wins on:

• Developer productivity
• Scalability
• Maintainability

Basically, Go gives you the power of concurrency without most of the pain . You get lightweight execution units, elegant communication primitives, and a runtime that works for you—not against you.

The above is the detailed content of Go's Concurrency Model vs. Traditional Threads. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!