在C 中，切片問題是指將派生類對象賦值給基類類型變量時，導(dǎo)致派生類部分被“切掉”，1.發(fā)生對象切片時，僅複製基類部分，丟棄派生類成員；2.問題核心在於丟失數(shù)據(jù)和多態(tài)行為，可能引發(fā)錯誤；3.避免方法包括：使用指針或引用、避免直接拷貝到基類變量、設(shè)計抽象基類、使用智能指針容器；4.當(dāng)使用多態(tài)、派生類添加重要數(shù)據(jù)或設(shè)計可擴展類層次時，切片問題尤為關(guān)鍵。

In C , the slicing problem occurs when you assign an object of a derived class to a variable of a base class type, which results in the object being "sliced" — losing the derived part of the object. This is a subtle but important issue that can lead to data loss and unexpected behavior if not handled carefully.

What Happens During Object Slicing?

When you pass or assign a derived class object to a function or variable expecting a base class object (not a pointer or reference), only the base class portion of the object is copied. The additional members defined in the derived class are discarded , hence the term "slicing."

For example:

 class Base {
public:
    int x;
};

class Derived : public Base {
public:
    int y;
};

Derived d;
dx = 10;
dy = 20;

Base b = d; // Slicing occurs here

After this assignment, b contains only the x member with value 10, and the y member from d is lost.

This happens because Base b = d creates a new Base object by calling the base class's copy constructor (or converting constructor if applicable), and doesn't include any derived class-specific data.

Why Is Slicing a Problem?

Slicing becomes an issue when polymorphic behavior is expected but not preserved. Since the derived part is lost, virtual functions may not behave as intended if called on the sliced object.

Here's what makes it tricky:

• It often happens silently — no compiler error.
• It's easy to do accidentally, especially when passing objects by value.
• Once sliced, you lose both data and functionality.

Imagine writing code expecting to call a derived class method via a base class interface, only to find out later that slicing caused the wrong method to be called — or worse, data corruption.

How to Avoid Slicing

To prevent slicing, follow these strategies:

• ? Use pointers or references instead of passing by value

  If you're working with polymorphic types, always pass or store them as pointers or references:

   Base& bRef = d; // No slicing
  Base* bPtr = &d; // No slicing

• ? Avoid copying derived objects into base class variables

  Be cautious with assignments and function parameters. If a function takes a Base by value, passing a Derived will slice it.

• ? Make the base class abstract (optional)

  If you don't want anyone to instantiate the base class directly, make it abstract by adding at least one pure virtual function:

   class Base {
  public:
      virtual void foo() = 0; // Pure virtual function
  };

  This way, users can't accidentally create a Base object, reducing slicing risk.

• ? Use smart pointers for polymorphic containers

  When storing objects in containers like std::vector , use std::unique_ptr or std::shared_ptr :

   std::vector<std::unique_ptr<Base>> objects;
  objects.push_back(std::make_unique<Derived>());

  ---

  When Does Slicing Actually Matter?

  Slicing matters most in situations where:

  • You're using polymorphism and expect runtime dispatching of virtual functions.
  • Your derived classes add non-trivial data or behavior .
  • You're designing class hierarchies meant for extension.

  If your derived classes don't add much beyond what's in the base class, slicing might not hurt — but it's still better to design defensively and avoid it altogether.

  ---

  So, basically, slicing in C is about losing derived-class information when assigning or passing objects by value. It's not complicated, but it's easy to miss until it breaks something quietly.

  以上是C中的切片問題是什麼？的詳細(xì)內(nèi)容。更多資訊請關(guān)注PHP中文網(wǎng)其他相關(guān)文章！