The technology stack is consistently preferred: the team uses React to select Next.js and Nuxt.js to use Vue to select Nuxt.js; 2. SSR is close to performance, Next.js is more mature in CDN and edge functions, and Nuxt 3's Nitro engine deployment is more flexible; 3. In terms of development experience, Next.js is better than configuration and suitable for rapid development, and Nuxt.js is flexible in configuration and suitable for medium and large projects; 4. In terms of ecology, the Next.js community is larger and has richer resources, and Nuxt.js has a high status in the Vue ecosystem and has complete modules; finally it is recommended to choose based on the team's technical stack. Next.js is preferred for React projects, and Nuxt.js is preferred for Vue projects. The matching degree of technology stack determines development efficiency.
When you are on the Selective Server Rendering (SSR) framework, Next.js and Nuxt.js are the two most mainstream choices, based on React and Vue. Although they solve similar problems - improving the loading speed of the first screen, improving SEO, and enhancing the user experience - there are obvious differences in the technology stack, ecology and development experience. The following is a detailed comparison of the two to help you make choices based on project needs.
1. Technology stack and core ecology
Next.js (React JavaScript/TypeScript)
Based on React, maintained by the Vercel team. If your team is familiar with React and uses React ecosystems (such as Redux, React Query, Tailwind CSS), Next.js is a natural extension. It has very good support for TypeScript, a huge community, and a mature toolchain.Nuxt.js (Vue JavaScript/TypeScript)
Based on Vue, maintained by the Nuxt team. Suitable for Vue developers, especially projects that use Vue 3 and Composition APIs. Nuxt 3 has fully supported TypeScript and Nitro engines, with significantly improved performance and flexibility.
? Selection Suggestions:
- Teams use React → Next.js
- Team use Vue → Nuxt.js
Technology stack consistency is more important than the framework itself.
2. SSR implementation and performance
Both support SSR natively, but the implementation is slightly different:
-
Next.js
- Files are routes (
pages/
orapp/
directories), and the configuration is simple. - App Router (based on React Server Components) further optimizes SSR and streaming rendering.
- Automatically generates static resources, supports ISR (incremental static regeneration), and is suitable for content-based websites (such as blogs, e-commerce).
- Fast build, almost zero configuration deployed to Vercel.
- Files are routes (
-
Nuxt.js
- It also supports file routing (
pages/
) and has more flexible configuration. - Using the Nitro engine, it supports multiple deployment targets (such as Serverless, Static, Node.js).
- Provides
ssr: true/false
to explicitly control the rendering mode. - Supports automatic code segmentation and asynchronous component loading.
- It also supports file routing (
?? Performance comparison:
In the same configuration, the SSR performance of the two is similar. Next.js is more mature in CDN integration and Edge Functions because it is popular earlier; Nuxt 3's Nitro engine is more flexible in custom deployment.
3. Development experience and configuration
-
Next.js: Convention is better than configuration
- Out of the box,
pages
directory automatically maps routes. - Built-in API routing, front and back ends can be integrated with development.
- Few configurations, suitable for quick start projects.
- Use
next.config.js
to extend functionality (such as custom Webpack).
- Out of the box,
-
Nuxt.js: More flexible configuration
- Using
nuxt.config.ts
, the modular design is strong. - Support plug-in systems (such as
@nuxtjs/axios
,@nuxtjs/tailwindcss
). - It can be extended through
modules
, suitable for medium and large projects. - Provides syntax enhancement development experience such as
definePageMeta
.
- Using
?? Developer’s feelings:
- Next.js is more "light" and is suitable for quick launch of small to medium-sized projects.
- Nuxt.js is more "heavy" but highly scalable, suitable for teams that require customized architectures.
4. Ecological and community support
-
Next.js
- The community is huge, with over 100,000 GitHub stars and complete documentation.
- A large number of third-party libraries, templates, and UI components (such as NextUI, ShadCN).
- Adopted by a large number of enterprises (such as Netflix, TikTok stores).
-
Nuxt.js
- The community is small but active, and the Vue ecosystem has a high status.
- There are rich official modules (such as Nuxt Auth, Nuxt Image).
- More popular in Europe and some companies (such as Renault’s official website).
? Ecological suggestions:
Next.js has obvious advantages if you need to find a solution quickly or hire a developer.
Summary: How to choose?
Dimension | Next.js is more suitable | Nuxt.js is more suitable |
---|---|---|
Technology stack | React Projects | Vue Project |
Get started speed | Fast, promise priority | Medium, need to understand the module system |
Extensibility | good | Stronger (modular design) |
Deploy integration | Vercel One-click deployment | Multi-platform support (Nitro) |
Community Support | Extremely Strong | Medium to top |
? Final Suggestions:
- Using React? Choose Next.js , and the ecology, performance, and tool chain are more mature.
- Using Vue? Choose Nuxt.js , which is the most mature SSR framework in the Vue ecosystem.
Not complicated, but don't force it across the stack. No matter how good the framework is, it cannot withstand the efficiency advantages brought by team familiarity. Basically that's it.
The above is the detailed content of Server-Side Rendering (SSR) with Next.js vs. Nuxt.js. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!

Hot AI Tools

Undress AI Tool
Undress images for free

Undresser.AI Undress
AI-powered app for creating realistic nude photos

AI Clothes Remover
Online AI tool for removing clothes from photos.

Clothoff.io
AI clothes remover

Video Face Swap
Swap faces in any video effortlessly with our completely free AI face swap tool!

Hot Article

Hot Tools

Notepad++7.3.1
Easy-to-use and free code editor

SublimeText3 Chinese version
Chinese version, very easy to use

Zend Studio 13.0.1
Powerful PHP integrated development environment

Dreamweaver CS6
Visual web development tools

SublimeText3 Mac version
God-level code editing software (SublimeText3)

The reason why ARIA and HTML5 semantic tags are needed is that although HTML5 semantic elements have accessibility meanings, ARIA can supplement semantics and enhance auxiliary technology recognition capabilities. For example, when legacy browsers lack support, components without native tags (such as modal boxes), and state updates need to be dynamically updated, ARIA provides finer granular control. HTML5 elements such as nav, main, aside correspond to ARIArole by default, and do not need to be added manually unless the default behavior needs to be overridden. The situations where ARIA should be added include: 1. Supplement the missing status information, such as using aria-expanded to represent the button expansion/collapse status; 2. Add semantic roles to non-semantic tags, such as using div role to implement tabs and match them

HTML5, CSS and JavaScript should be efficiently combined with semantic tags, reasonable loading order and decoupling design. 1. Use HTML5 semantic tags, such as improving structural clarity and maintainability, which is conducive to SEO and barrier-free access; 2. CSS should be placed in, use external files and split by module to avoid inline styles and delayed loading problems; 3. JavaScript is recommended to be introduced in front, and use defer or async to load asynchronously to avoid blocking rendering; 4. Reduce strong dependence between the three, drive behavior through data-* attributes and class name control status, and improve collaboration efficiency through unified naming specifications. These methods can effectively optimize page performance and collaborate with teams.

Common reasons why HTML5 videos don't play in Chrome include format compatibility, autoplay policy, path or MIME type errors, and browser extension interference. 1. Videos should be given priority to using MP4 (H.264) format, or provide multiple tags to adapt to different browsers; 2. Automatic playback requires adding muted attributes or triggering .play() with JavaScript after user interaction; 3. Check whether the file path is correct and ensure that the server is configured with the correct MIME type. Local testing is recommended to use a development server; 4. Ad blocking plug-in or privacy mode may prevent loading, so you can try to disable the plug-in, replace the traceless window or update the browser version to solve the problem.

Using HTML5 semantic tags can improve web structure clarity, accessibility and SEO effects. 1. Semantic tags such as,,,, and make it easier for the machine to understand the page content; 2. Each tag has a clear purpose: used in the top area, wrap navigation links, include core content, display independent articles, group relevant content, place sidebars, and display bottom information; 3. Avoid abuse when using it, ensure that only one per page, avoid excessive nesting, reasonable use and in blocks. Mastering these key points can make the web page structure more standardized and practical.

Embed web videos using HTML5 tags, supports multi-format compatibility, custom controls and responsive design. 1. Basic usage: add tags and set src and controls attributes to realize playback functions; 2. Support multi-formats: introduce different formats such as MP4, WebM, Ogg, etc. through tags to improve browser compatibility; 3. Custom appearance and behavior: hide default controls and implement style adjustment and interactive logic through CSS and JavaScript; 4. Pay attention to details: Set muted and autoplay to achieve automatic playback, use preload to control loading strategies, combine width and max-width to achieve responsive layout, and use add subtitles to enhance accessibility.

It is a block-level element, suitable for layout; it is an inline element, suitable for wrapping text content. 1. Exclusively occupy a line, width, height and margins can be set, which are often used in structural layout; 2. No line breaks, the size is determined by the content, and is suitable for local text styles or dynamic operations; 3. When choosing, it should be judged based on whether the content needs independent space; 4. It cannot be nested and is not suitable for layout; 5. Priority is given to the use of semantic labels to improve structural clarity and accessibility.

Yes, you can save its contents as an image using the HTML5Canvas built-in toDataURL() method. First, call canvas.toDataURL ('image/png') to convert the canvas content to a base64 string in PNG format; if JPEG or WebP format is required, the corresponding type and quality parameters such as canvas.toDataURL ('image/jpeg', 0.8) can be passed in. Then you can achieve download by creating a dynamic link and triggering a click event: 1. Create an element a; 2. Set the download attribute and href as image data; 3. Call the click() method. Note that this operation should be triggered by user interaction.

To obtain user location information, you must first obtain authorization. When using HTML5's GeolocationAPI, the first step is to request user permission. If the user refuses or fails to respond, an error should be handled and a prompt should be given; after successful authorization, the Position object includes coords (latitude, longitude, etc.) and timestamp; you can use watchPosition to monitor location changes, but you need to pay attention to performance issues and clear the listener in time. 1. Authorization requires the user to explicitly allow it to trigger the getCurrentPosition method request; 2. Process error.code when rejected or errored and prompt the user; 3. After success, position.coords provides location data; 4.watc
