Vitest is significantly faster than Jest due to its use of Vite’s native ES modules and esbuild prebundling, resulting in quicker test startup and instant file reloading, while Jest’s reliance on Babel or ts-jest adds transformation overhead. 2. Vitest seamlessly integrates with Vite-based projects by inheriting the Vite configuration, sharing plugins, aliases, and asset handling, reducing duplication, whereas Jest operates independently and requires separate configuration for TypeScript, JSX, and module resolution. 3. Vitest offers high API compatibility with Jest, supporting familiar methods like describe, test, expect, and jest.fn(), enabling easy migration with minimal code changes, though slight differences in jest.mock() hoisting and some missing matchers may require adjustments. 4. Vitest provides first-class TypeScript and ESM support out of the box via Vite without needing ts-jest or Babel, while Jest requires additional setup and has historically struggled with ESM. 5. Jest leads in ecosystem maturity with strong backing from Meta, extensive tooling, widespread adoption, and better support in enterprise environments, while Vitest, though rapidly growing, has a smaller plugin ecosystem and less documentation. 6. Choose Vitest for Vite-based projects, new React/Vue/Svelte apps, or when speed and modern tooling are priorities; stick with Jest for Create React App, Webpack, complex monorepos, or when maximum stability and ecosystem support are required. Ultimately, use Vitest when possible for faster, simpler testing, but rely on Jest when ecosystem maturity or legacy compatibility is necessary.

When it comes to choosing a testing framework for JavaScript and TypeScript projects, Jest has long been the go-to solution. But in recent years, Vitest has emerged as a compelling alternative—especially for projects using Vite. So how do they compare? Let’s break it down across key areas to help you decide which fits your needs better.

1. Performance and Speed

Vitest wins by a wide margin.

One of the biggest advantages of Vitest is its speed. Built specifically for Vite, it leverages Vite’s native ES modules and esbuild-powered prebundling, which means:

• Tests start faster
• File reloading is near-instant
• No need to transpile everything with Babel or TypeScript first (though it still supports it)

Jest, on the other hand, uses its own module resolution and mocking system, which requires transforming files through Babel or ts-jest. This adds overhead, especially in large codebases.

? Winner: Vitest – especially noticeable in large or monorepo setups.

2. Integration with Build Tools

Jest was designed to be framework-agnostic and works well with Webpack, Babel, Rollup, etc. But it operates independently of your build setup, which can lead to configuration duplication (e.g., telling Jest how to handle TypeScript or JSX).

Vitest, by contrast, inherits your Vite config automatically. If you're already using Vite (common in modern React, Vue, or Svelte apps), Vitest:

• Uses the same plugins and resolvers
• Shares aliases, JSX settings, and asset handling
• Reduces configuration overhead

This tight integration means fewer surprises—what works in your app usually works in your tests.

? Winner: Vitest – if you're on Vite.
? Stick with Jest – if you're on Webpack, Create React App, or not using Vite.

3. API Compatibility and Migration

Vitest was designed to be largely compatible with Jest’s API. It supports:

• describe, test, expect
• Mock functions (jest.fn(), mockImplementation, etc.)
• Timers (jest.useFakeTimers)
• Manual mocks via __mocks__ folder

That means you can often migrate a Jest project to Vitest with minimal changes—sometimes just swapping the runner and dev dependency.

However, not everything is 100% compatible. Some edge cases include:

• jest.mock() hoisting behavior differs slightly
• Certain Jest-specific matchers or internal APIs may not be fully replicated
• Some third-party Jest matchers may need alternatives

? Winner: Vitest – for easy migration and Jest-like DX.

4. TypeScript and ESM Support

Vitest has first-class support for TypeScript via Vite’s native handling. It doesn’t require ts-jest or Babel plugins—just enable the @vitejs/plugin-vue or similar, and .ts files work out of the box.

Jest needs extra setup:

• ts-jest transformer
• Potentially Babel for ESM
• More config to align with your TS setup

Also, Jest has historically had awkward ESM support. Vitest treats ESM as a first-class citizen.

? Winner: Vitest – simpler, faster, more modern.

5. Ecosystem and Community

Here, Jest still leads.

• Backed by Meta (Facebook)
• Used in millions of projects
• Huge ecosystem: reporters, matchers, CI integrations
• Better tooling in older or enterprise environments

Vitest is growing fast, but it’s newer:

• Smaller plugin ecosystem
• Less documentation in non-English languages
• Not yet standard in many company starter kits

? Winner: Jest – for maturity and broad support.

6. Use Cases: When to Choose Which?

Final Thoughts

Vitest is the future for Vite-based projects. It’s faster, simpler to configure, and feels more in sync with modern JavaScript tooling.

But Jest isn’t going anywhere. It’s stable, battle-tested, and deeply embedded in the ecosystem.

If you’re starting fresh with Vite, go with Vitest—you’ll save time and gain speed.
If you’re in a complex, established codebase, Jest might still be the safer bet.

Basically:
? Use Vitest when you can.
? Stick with Jest when you must.

The above is the detailed content of Comparing Testing Frameworks: Jest vs. Vitest. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!