Selecting an interface or an abstract class in Java depends on design requirements. The interface defines the behavior contract and supports multiple inheritance, which is suitable for the general ability of unrelated classes; abstract classes provide shared logic and fields, which is suitable for closely related class inheritance. 1. The interface is used to define method contracts (the default and static methods can be included after Java 8), and the abstract class can contain abstract and concrete methods and instance variables. 2. Classes can implement multiple interfaces but can only inherit one abstract class, which is suitable for scenarios where multiple behaviors need to be mixed. 3. The interface field defaults to public static final, and the method defaults to public; the abstract class supports various access modifiers and non-static non-final fields. 4. The Java 8 interface supports default methods, which facilitates API evolution without destroying existing implementations; abstract classes can always add methods with implementations. 5. If you need to share code, control construction logic, or declare non-static fields, choose abstract classes, and if you need to define behavior contracts, multiple inheritance or future expansion, choose interfaces, and the two can also be used together.

When you're working with Java and trying to design a system using object-oriented principles, one common decision point is whether to use an interface or an abstract class. The main difference lies in their usage: interfaces define behavior that classes can implement , while abstract classes provide a base for subclasses to build upon, potentially including both method definitions and implementations .

Let's break this down into more dirty parts based on what developers usually care about when making this choice.

1. Definition and Purpose

Interfaces and abstract classes serve different architectural goals.

• Interfaces are all about defining a contract. They tell a class what methods it must implement but don't provide any implementation themselves (prior to Java 8). From Java 8 onward, interfaces can include default and static methods.

  

• Abstract classes , on the other hand, are meant to be extended. They can have both abstract methods (with implementation) and concrete methods (with implementation). They often represent a shared base with some logic already baked in.

A real-world example:

• If you're modeling shapes, an interface Resizable might require implementing a resize(double factor) method.
• An abstract class Shape could provide a getArea() abstract method, along with a concrete printDetails() method that outputs basic info.

2. Inheritance Model

Java allows multiple inheritance through interfaces, but not with abstract classes.

• A class can implement multiple interfaces , which makes them powerful when you want to mix in several behaviors.
• But a class can only extend one abstract class , due to Java's single inheritance model for classes.

So if you need your class to support logging, resizing, and serializing, using interfaces like Loggable , Resizable , and Serializable make sense.

3. Access Modifiers and Fields

There are subtle but important differences in how each handles fields and access control.

• Interfaces can only have public static final fields by default (constants), and all methods are public unless specified as private (from Java 9).
• Abstract classes can have instance variables , non-static and non-final fields, and support all access modifiers like private, protected, etc.

This means:

• If you need to store state, an abstract class is more flexible.
• If you just need to enforce constants or behaviors across unrelated classes, interfaces are better suited.

4. Evolution and Default Methods

Before Java 8, adding a new method to an interface would break all existing implementations. Now, thanks to default methods , interfaces can evolve without breaking compatibility.

• Abstract classes have always been able to add new methods with implementations without breaking subclasses (as long as they're not abstract).
• So, if backward compatibility matters and you're working with a widely used API, default methods in interfaces offer a modern solution.

For example:

 public interface Vehicle {
    void move();

    default void honk() {
        System.out.println("Beep!");
    }
}

Now, any class implementing Vehicle doesn't have to override honk() immediately.

5. When to Use Which?

Here's a quick guide to help decide:

• ? Use an interface when:

  • You want to define a capability or behavior that can be implemented by unrelated classes.
  • You need multiple inheritance of type or behavior.
  • You're designing APIs that may change over time using default methods.

• ? Use an abstract class when:

  • You want to share code among closely related classes.
  • You need to declare non-static or non-final fields.
  • You want to control constructor logic that subclasses must follow.

You can even combine both — for example, having an abstract class that implements one or more interfaces.

Basically, the choice depends on your specific design needs. Both have their strengths, and sometimes using a mix gives you the most flexibility.

The above is the detailed content of Key Differences Between Java Interfaces and Abstract Classes. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!