The IndieWeb is gaining traction, even holding a conference! The New Yorker recently highlighted its relevance, framing the current social media crisis around a central question: server ownership. The article points out that most online activity occurs on servers controlled by a few massive corporations. These companies, not charging users directly, must recoup costs through other means, essentially extracting value from user data.
The IndieWeb's core principle is self-hosting: complete control over your website, unlike platforms where you're reliant on third-party services. This doesn't preclude using those services; instead, it advocates for syndication – using your own site as the primary source and then distributing content elsewhere.
Instead of tweeting, write a blog post and automatically share it on Twitter. Instead of using Medium, publish on your own blog and then syndicate to Medium. This approach leverages the benefits of these platforms without surrendering control.
Personally, self-hosting has been incredibly beneficial. Khoi Vinh eloquently describes its impact as an "amplifier," boosting his career visibility in ways that wouldn't have been possible otherwise.
While I self-host, I haven't fully embraced syndication, choosing not to cross-post to other platforms. While this might limit reach, given recent platform changes (like Hacker Noon, freeCodeCamp, and Signal vs. Nose), I'm hesitant to invest heavily in syndication strategies. The IndieWeb approach emphasizes syndication as re-posting, not as the primary location for original content, which is a crucial distinction.
My concern with syndication is potential SEO issues: would external SEO overshadow my own site's ranking? Relying on rel="canonical"
tags, which aren't universally supported (Medium, for example, requires import tools), is problematic. This explains the frequent "originally published on..." disclaimers.
I'm torn between two perspectives. While I value analytics for understanding audience engagement and fulfilling sponsorship obligations, I appreciate the viewpoint of those prioritizing creative freedom over quantifiable metrics. Om Malik's decision to forgo analytics on his blog, focusing solely on personal satisfaction, is a compelling example.
Syndication to Twitter is particularly problematic. Year-end analytics consistently show minimal traffic from Twitter, despite significant effort invested in tweeting. I justify this by highlighting Twitter's role in industry updates and idea generation.
However, I could achieve these benefits without relying solely on Twitter for link-sharing and commentary. An IndieWeb approach is preferable, but I hesitate due to the added technical complexity and the perceived stylistic differences between tweets and blog posts.
Another IndieWeb component is webmentions, a POST-based system. When you link to someone's site, a webmention POST notifies them, allowing them to manage the interaction (typically saving it and displaying it like a comment). This offers several advantages:
- Centralized discussions: Responses from various platforms (Twitter, other blogs) are collected in one place.
- Promotes self-hosting: Encourages responses on individual websites, fostering a decentralized social web.
For WordPress users, this resembles pingbacks and trackbacks. Webmentions appear simpler and superior, and plugins are available. However, past experiences with pingback/trackback spam raise concerns about potential abuse.
Webmentions are reciprocal. You configure your site to receive POSTs, and ideally, you'd reciprocate by POSTing webmentions to others' sites when referencing their work. While plugins exist, many hand-roll their implementations. Services like Remy's simplify this process, automatically identifying links and sending webmentions.
The beauty of the IndieWeb is its incremental nature. Each step forward offers benefits, and collective adoption enhances the overall experience.
The above is the detailed content of IndieWeb and Webmentions. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!

Hot AI Tools

Undress AI Tool
Undress images for free

Undresser.AI Undress
AI-powered app for creating realistic nude photos

AI Clothes Remover
Online AI tool for removing clothes from photos.

Clothoff.io
AI clothes remover

Video Face Swap
Swap faces in any video effortlessly with our completely free AI face swap tool!

Hot Article

Hot Tools

Notepad++7.3.1
Easy-to-use and free code editor

SublimeText3 Chinese version
Chinese version, very easy to use

Zend Studio 13.0.1
Powerful PHP integrated development environment

Dreamweaver CS6
Visual web development tools

SublimeText3 Mac version
God-level code editing software (SublimeText3)

There are three ways to create a CSS loading rotator: 1. Use the basic rotator of borders to achieve simple animation through HTML and CSS; 2. Use a custom rotator of multiple points to achieve the jump effect through different delay times; 3. Add a rotator in the button and switch classes through JavaScript to display the loading status. Each approach emphasizes the importance of design details such as color, size, accessibility and performance optimization to enhance the user experience.

To deal with CSS browser compatibility and prefix issues, you need to understand the differences in browser support and use vendor prefixes reasonably. 1. Understand common problems such as Flexbox and Grid support, position:sticky invalid, and animation performance is different; 2. Check CanIuse confirmation feature support status; 3. Correctly use -webkit-, -moz-, -ms-, -o- and other manufacturer prefixes; 4. It is recommended to use Autoprefixer to automatically add prefixes; 5. Install PostCSS and configure browserslist to specify the target browser; 6. Automatically handle compatibility during construction; 7. Modernizr detection features can be used for old projects; 8. No need to pursue consistency of all browsers,

Use the clip-path attribute of CSS to crop elements into custom shapes, such as triangles, circular notches, polygons, etc., without relying on pictures or SVGs. Its advantages include: 1. Supports a variety of basic shapes such as circle, ellipse, polygon, etc.; 2. Responsive adjustment and adaptable to mobile terminals; 3. Easy to animation, and can be combined with hover or JavaScript to achieve dynamic effects; 4. It does not affect the layout flow, and only crops the display area. Common usages are such as circular clip-path:circle (50pxatcenter) and triangle clip-path:polygon (50%0%, 100 0%, 0 0%). Notice

Themaindifferencesbetweendisplay:inline,block,andinline-blockinHTML/CSSarelayoutbehavior,spaceusage,andstylingcontrol.1.Inlineelementsflowwithtext,don’tstartonnewlines,ignorewidth/height,andonlyapplyhorizontalpadding/margins—idealforinlinetextstyling

Setting the style of links you have visited can improve the user experience, especially in content-intensive websites to help users navigate better. 1. Use CSS's: visited pseudo-class to define the style of the visited link, such as color changes; 2. Note that the browser only allows modification of some attributes due to privacy restrictions; 3. The color selection should be coordinated with the overall style to avoid abruptness; 4. The mobile terminal may not display this effect, and it is recommended to combine it with other visual prompts such as icon auxiliary logos.

To create responsive images using CSS, it can be mainly achieved through the following methods: 1. Use max-width:100% and height:auto to allow the image to adapt to the container width while maintaining the proportion; 2. Use HTML's srcset and sizes attributes to intelligently load the image sources adapted to different screens; 3. Use object-fit and object-position to control image cropping and focus display. Together, these methods ensure that the images are presented clearly and beautifully on different devices.

Different browsers have differences in CSS parsing, resulting in inconsistent display effects, mainly including the default style difference, box model calculation method, Flexbox and Grid layout support level, and inconsistent behavior of certain CSS attributes. 1. The default style processing is inconsistent. The solution is to use CSSReset or Normalize.css to unify the initial style; 2. The box model calculation method of the old version of IE is different. It is recommended to use box-sizing:border-box in a unified manner; 3. Flexbox and Grid perform differently in edge cases or in old versions. More tests and use Autoprefixer; 4. Some CSS attribute behaviors are inconsistent. CanIuse must be consulted and downgraded.

The choice of CSS units depends on design requirements and responsive requirements. 1.px is used for fixed size, suitable for precise control but lack of elasticity; 2.em is a relative unit, which is easily caused by the influence of the parent element, while rem is more stable based on the root element and is suitable for global scaling; 3.vw/vh is based on the viewport size, suitable for responsive design, but attention should be paid to the performance under extreme screens; 4. When choosing, it should be determined based on whether responsive adjustments, element hierarchy relationships and viewport dependence. Reasonable use can improve layout flexibility and maintenance.
