Let's explore the world of "Static Form Providers." These services handle the backend complexities of your HTML forms, freeing you from the burden of validation, storage, notifications, and API integrations. While often subscription-based (monthly or annual), their cost typically undercuts more comprehensive form builders that include front-end design tools.
This article compares several popular static form providers:
- Kwes
- Basin
- FieldGoal
- Formcarry
- FormKeep
- Formspree
- FormSubmit
- formX
- Getform
- Netlify Forms
Note: Feature comparisons are based on website information and provider confirmations. Thanks to Kwes, FormKeep, Formspree, FormSubmit, formX, and Netlify Forms for verifying details.
Form Construction, Validation & Spam Filtering
Provider | Custom Components | Front-End Validation | Back-End Validation |
---|---|---|---|
Kwes | ? | ? | ? |
Basin | ? | ? | ? |
FieldGoal | Unconfirmed | Unconfirmed | Unconfirmed |
FormCarry | ? | ? | ? |
FormKeep | ? | ? | ? |
Formspree | ? | ? | ? |
FormSubmit | ? | ? | ? |
formX | ? | ? | ? |
Getform | ? | ? | ? |
Netlify Forms | ? | ? | ? |
Most providers require adding custom HTML attributes to your form elements (text inputs, textareas, etc.). The form's action
attribute points to the provider's URL for submission and processing. FormKeep offers a form designer, but otherwise, styling is your responsibility. Kwes and FormKeep uniquely support custom components. Only Kwes provides front-end and back-end validation, enhancing security. Others rely on HTML5 validation and spam protection.
Provider | Spam Protection |
---|---|
Kwes | AI, Honeypot, Blacklists, Proprietary Tech |
Basin | Akismet, CleanTalk, reCAPTCHA, Honeypot |
FieldGoal | Provided, details unconfirmed |
FormCarry | Akismet, reCAPTCHA |
FormKeep | Provided, details unconfirmed |
Formspree | Akismet, Profanity Filter, Authorized Domains, Custom reCAPTCHA, Honeypot, Custom Filtering |
FormSubmit | reCAPTCHA, Honeypot |
formX | reCAPTCHA, Honeypot |
Getform | Akismet, reCAPTCHA |
Netlify Forms | Akismet, reCAPTCHA, Honeypot |
Kwes boasts a 99.6% spam block rate without extra setup. All providers offer spam protection, employing various methods (reCAPTCHA, Akismet, honeypots, AI). Remember that additional security measures might slightly impact submission rates.
Notifications, Branding & Redirects
Provider | Confirmations | Notifications | Email Routing |
---|---|---|---|
Kwes | ? | ? | ? |
Basin | ? | ? | ? |
FieldGoal | Unconfirmed | Unconfirmed | Unconfirmed |
FormCarry | ? | ? | ? |
FormKeep | ? | ? | ? |
Formspree | ? | ? | ? |
FormSubmit | ? | ? | ? |
formX | ? | ? | ? |
Getform | ? | ? | ? |
Netlify Forms | ? | ? | ? |
Email confirmations are crucial for user experience. All providers (except FieldGoal) offer confirmations, notifications, and email routing. Some also support alternative notifications (push, Slack).
Provider | White Label | Custom Redirects |
---|---|---|
Kwes | ? | ? |
Basin | ? | ? |
FieldGoal | Unconfirmed | Unconfirmed |
FormCarry | ? | ? |
FormKeep | ? | ? |
Formspree | ? | ? |
FormSubmit | ? | ? |
formX | ? | ? |
Getform | ? | ? |
Netlify Forms | ? | ? |
White labeling allows for branded communications. All providers (except potentially FieldGoal) support this, enhancing brand consistency. Custom redirects improve user flow after submission; most providers offer this (again, FieldGoal's status is unconfirmed).
File Storage, Data Export & API Access
Provider | Upload Storage |
---|---|
Kwes | 200MB/file, 20GB total |
Basin | 100MB/submission |
FieldGoal | Amazon S3 |
FormCarry | 5MB/file, 5GB total |
FormKeep | 2.5GB total |
Formspree | 10MB/file, 10GB total |
FormSubmit | Included, amounts unconfirmed |
formX | ? |
Getform | 25MB/submission, 25GB total |
Netlify Forms | 1GB total |
File storage varies significantly. formX lacks this feature. Limits on individual file sizes and total submission sizes are crucial considerations.
Provider | Data Export | API Access |
---|---|---|
Kwes | ? | ? |
Basin | ? | ? |
FieldGoal | Unconfirmed | Unconfirmed |
FormCarry | ? | ? |
FormKeep | ? | ? |
Formspree | ? | ? |
FormSubmit | ? | ? |
formX | ? | On demand |
Getform | ? | ? |
Netlify Forms | ? | ? |
Data export (CSV, JSON) is essential for analysis and integration. Most providers support this. API access is vital for custom integrations; Getform is the exception, while formX offers it on demand.
Webhooks, Zapier & Analytics
Provider | Webhooks | Zapier |
---|---|---|
Kwes | ? | ? |
Basin | ? | ? |
FieldGoal | Unconfirmed | ? |
FormCarry | ? | ? |
FormKeep | ? | ? |
Formspree | ? | ? |
FormSubmit | ? | ? |
formX | ? | ? |
Getform | ? | ? |
Netlify Forms | ? | ? |
Webhooks and Zapier integration facilitate third-party connections. FormSubmit is the only provider without Zapier support.
Provider | Analytics |
---|---|
Kwes | ? |
Basin | ? |
FieldGoal | Unconfirmed |
FormCarry | ? |
FormKeep | ? |
Formspree | ? |
FormSubmit | ? |
formX | ? |
Getform | ? |
Netlify Forms | ? |
Analytics dashboards provide valuable insights into form performance. This feature is less common, with only Basin, FormKeep, and formX offering it.
Pricing
(Detailed pricing table omitted for brevity, but original table should be included here for completeness. It would be beneficial to summarize key pricing tiers and features across providers).
Conclusion
Static form providers simplify form integration for static sites. Key features include spam protection, email notifications, and data management capabilities. Consider your specific needs (custom components, validation, analytics) when selecting a provider. The author's personal preference is Kwes, highlighting its strengths in spam protection, usability, and comprehensive validation. Remember to thoroughly evaluate your requirements before making a decision.
The above is the detailed content of A Comparison of Static Form Providers. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!

Hot AI Tools

Undress AI Tool
Undress images for free

Undresser.AI Undress
AI-powered app for creating realistic nude photos

AI Clothes Remover
Online AI tool for removing clothes from photos.

Clothoff.io
AI clothes remover

Video Face Swap
Swap faces in any video effortlessly with our completely free AI face swap tool!

Hot Article

Hot Tools

Notepad++7.3.1
Easy-to-use and free code editor

SublimeText3 Chinese version
Chinese version, very easy to use

Zend Studio 13.0.1
Powerful PHP integrated development environment

Dreamweaver CS6
Visual web development tools

SublimeText3 Mac version
God-level code editing software (SublimeText3)

Hot Topics

There are three ways to create a CSS loading rotator: 1. Use the basic rotator of borders to achieve simple animation through HTML and CSS; 2. Use a custom rotator of multiple points to achieve the jump effect through different delay times; 3. Add a rotator in the button and switch classes through JavaScript to display the loading status. Each approach emphasizes the importance of design details such as color, size, accessibility and performance optimization to enhance the user experience.

To deal with CSS browser compatibility and prefix issues, you need to understand the differences in browser support and use vendor prefixes reasonably. 1. Understand common problems such as Flexbox and Grid support, position:sticky invalid, and animation performance is different; 2. Check CanIuse confirmation feature support status; 3. Correctly use -webkit-, -moz-, -ms-, -o- and other manufacturer prefixes; 4. It is recommended to use Autoprefixer to automatically add prefixes; 5. Install PostCSS and configure browserslist to specify the target browser; 6. Automatically handle compatibility during construction; 7. Modernizr detection features can be used for old projects; 8. No need to pursue consistency of all browsers,

Use the clip-path attribute of CSS to crop elements into custom shapes, such as triangles, circular notches, polygons, etc., without relying on pictures or SVGs. Its advantages include: 1. Supports a variety of basic shapes such as circle, ellipse, polygon, etc.; 2. Responsive adjustment and adaptable to mobile terminals; 3. Easy to animation, and can be combined with hover or JavaScript to achieve dynamic effects; 4. It does not affect the layout flow, and only crops the display area. Common usages are such as circular clip-path:circle (50pxatcenter) and triangle clip-path:polygon (50%0%, 100 0%, 0 0%). Notice

Themaindifferencesbetweendisplay:inline,block,andinline-blockinHTML/CSSarelayoutbehavior,spaceusage,andstylingcontrol.1.Inlineelementsflowwithtext,don’tstartonnewlines,ignorewidth/height,andonlyapplyhorizontalpadding/margins—idealforinlinetextstyling

Setting the style of links you have visited can improve the user experience, especially in content-intensive websites to help users navigate better. 1. Use CSS's: visited pseudo-class to define the style of the visited link, such as color changes; 2. Note that the browser only allows modification of some attributes due to privacy restrictions; 3. The color selection should be coordinated with the overall style to avoid abruptness; 4. The mobile terminal may not display this effect, and it is recommended to combine it with other visual prompts such as icon auxiliary logos.

TheCSSPaintingAPIenablesdynamicimagegenerationinCSSusingJavaScript.1.DeveloperscreateaPaintWorkletclasswithapaint()method.2.TheyregisteritviaregisterPaint().3.ThecustompaintfunctionisthenusedinCSSpropertieslikebackground-image.Thisallowsfordynamicvis

To create responsive images using CSS, it can be mainly achieved through the following methods: 1. Use max-width:100% and height:auto to allow the image to adapt to the container width while maintaining the proportion; 2. Use HTML's srcset and sizes attributes to intelligently load the image sources adapted to different screens; 3. Use object-fit and object-position to control image cropping and focus display. Together, these methods ensure that the images are presented clearly and beautifully on different devices.

Different browsers have differences in CSS parsing, resulting in inconsistent display effects, mainly including the default style difference, box model calculation method, Flexbox and Grid layout support level, and inconsistent behavior of certain CSS attributes. 1. The default style processing is inconsistent. The solution is to use CSSReset or Normalize.css to unify the initial style; 2. The box model calculation method of the old version of IE is different. It is recommended to use box-sizing:border-box in a unified manner; 3. Flexbox and Grid perform differently in edge cases or in old versions. More tests and use Autoprefixer; 4. Some CSS attribute behaviors are inconsistent. CanIuse must be consulted and downgraded.
