Front-end framework selection: Custom or ready-made?
In the field of web development, choosing to customize a front-end framework or use an off-the-shelf framework (such as Bootstrap or Foundation) is a common problem. This article will dig into the pros and cons of both to help you make an informed choice.
Advantages of ready-made front-end frameworks:
The main advantages of ready-made frameworks such as Bootstrap and Foundation are:
- Reduce the development threshold: Just master the basic knowledge of HTML and CSS to build a website with complete functions.
- Save time and energy: Pre-built components and features significantly shorten the development cycle.
- Plug and Play: Easily integrate prefabricated components without excessive code writing.
- Stability and Testing: Fully tested to ensure cross-browser compatibility.
- Continuous update: Regular updates and fix bugs and add new features.
- Strong community support: Rich learning resources and community support.
However, these advantages are mainly reflected in development efficiency and the impact on the quality of the final product is not direct.
Disadvantages of ready-made front-end frameworks:
- Learning Cost: Time is still needed to be invested in learning how to use the framework.
- Redundant code: "One-size-fits-all" design results in code redundancy.
- Customization Requirements: Additional time is required to customize to meet specific needs.
- Labor uniqueness: Websites using the same framework look similar.
- Component Missing: The required components may be missing and additional integration is required.
- Code control is limited: Responsible to updates and modifications by the framework development team.
Advantages of custom frames:
The advantages of custom frames are:
- Long-term benefits: One-time investment, saving time and energy for a long time.
- No learning and customization required: The team is familiar with the framework and has high development efficiency.
- Targeted optimization: Meet specific needs and better performance.
- Simplified code: Avoid redundant code and improve performance.
- Full code control: Complete control over code and design.
- Modularity: Flexible selection of required components.
- Unified Code Base: Reduce third-party component dependencies.
- Negotiability: Ensure the uniqueness of the website.
Disadvantages of custom frames:
- Large investment in the early stage: Build, test and maintain requires more time and effort. But in the long run, this translates into a more efficient development process.
The third solution: semi-customized solution
In addition to fully customizing and directly using ready-made frameworks, there is also a "semi-customized" solution: deeply customizing ready-made frameworks. This combines the advantages of both, but requires both proficiency in both ready-made frameworks and custom code.
"Reinventing the wheel" is not always a bad thing
The reason many people oppose custom frames is to "reinvent the wheel." But history has proven that “reinventing the wheel” often leads to improvement and innovation. The key is improvement rather than simple copying.
How to make the right choice?
The key to making the right choice is to understand your own needs, capabilities and resources. The following issues need to be considered:
- Am I capable of creating custom frameworks?
- Do I have enough time?
- Is it reasonable to create a custom framework?
If all the answers are yes, a custom frame is the best choice.
FAQ
(The FAQ section in the original text is omitted here because the content of this part is highly overlapping with the above, just keep the key information to avoid duplication.)
This article is intended to help you make smarter decisions when choosing a front-end framework. I hope you can choose the most suitable solution according to your own situation.
The above is the detailed content of Front-end Frameworks: Custom vs Ready-to-use Solutions. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!

Hot AI Tools

Undress AI Tool
Undress images for free

Undresser.AI Undress
AI-powered app for creating realistic nude photos

AI Clothes Remover
Online AI tool for removing clothes from photos.

Clothoff.io
AI clothes remover

Video Face Swap
Swap faces in any video effortlessly with our completely free AI face swap tool!

Hot Article

Hot Tools

Notepad++7.3.1
Easy-to-use and free code editor

SublimeText3 Chinese version
Chinese version, very easy to use

Zend Studio 13.0.1
Powerful PHP integrated development environment

Dreamweaver CS6
Visual web development tools

SublimeText3 Mac version
God-level code editing software (SublimeText3)

Hot Topics

There are three ways to create a CSS loading rotator: 1. Use the basic rotator of borders to achieve simple animation through HTML and CSS; 2. Use a custom rotator of multiple points to achieve the jump effect through different delay times; 3. Add a rotator in the button and switch classes through JavaScript to display the loading status. Each approach emphasizes the importance of design details such as color, size, accessibility and performance optimization to enhance the user experience.

To deal with CSS browser compatibility and prefix issues, you need to understand the differences in browser support and use vendor prefixes reasonably. 1. Understand common problems such as Flexbox and Grid support, position:sticky invalid, and animation performance is different; 2. Check CanIuse confirmation feature support status; 3. Correctly use -webkit-, -moz-, -ms-, -o- and other manufacturer prefixes; 4. It is recommended to use Autoprefixer to automatically add prefixes; 5. Install PostCSS and configure browserslist to specify the target browser; 6. Automatically handle compatibility during construction; 7. Modernizr detection features can be used for old projects; 8. No need to pursue consistency of all browsers,

Use the clip-path attribute of CSS to crop elements into custom shapes, such as triangles, circular notches, polygons, etc., without relying on pictures or SVGs. Its advantages include: 1. Supports a variety of basic shapes such as circle, ellipse, polygon, etc.; 2. Responsive adjustment and adaptable to mobile terminals; 3. Easy to animation, and can be combined with hover or JavaScript to achieve dynamic effects; 4. It does not affect the layout flow, and only crops the display area. Common usages are such as circular clip-path:circle (50pxatcenter) and triangle clip-path:polygon (50%0%, 100 0%, 0 0%). Notice

Themaindifferencesbetweendisplay:inline,block,andinline-blockinHTML/CSSarelayoutbehavior,spaceusage,andstylingcontrol.1.Inlineelementsflowwithtext,don’tstartonnewlines,ignorewidth/height,andonlyapplyhorizontalpadding/margins—idealforinlinetextstyling

Setting the style of links you have visited can improve the user experience, especially in content-intensive websites to help users navigate better. 1. Use CSS's: visited pseudo-class to define the style of the visited link, such as color changes; 2. Note that the browser only allows modification of some attributes due to privacy restrictions; 3. The color selection should be coordinated with the overall style to avoid abruptness; 4. The mobile terminal may not display this effect, and it is recommended to combine it with other visual prompts such as icon auxiliary logos.

TheCSSPaintingAPIenablesdynamicimagegenerationinCSSusingJavaScript.1.DeveloperscreateaPaintWorkletclasswithapaint()method.2.TheyregisteritviaregisterPaint().3.ThecustompaintfunctionisthenusedinCSSpropertieslikebackground-image.Thisallowsfordynamicvis

To create responsive images using CSS, it can be mainly achieved through the following methods: 1. Use max-width:100% and height:auto to allow the image to adapt to the container width while maintaining the proportion; 2. Use HTML's srcset and sizes attributes to intelligently load the image sources adapted to different screens; 3. Use object-fit and object-position to control image cropping and focus display. Together, these methods ensure that the images are presented clearly and beautifully on different devices.

Different browsers have differences in CSS parsing, resulting in inconsistent display effects, mainly including the default style difference, box model calculation method, Flexbox and Grid layout support level, and inconsistent behavior of certain CSS attributes. 1. The default style processing is inconsistent. The solution is to use CSSReset or Normalize.css to unify the initial style; 2. The box model calculation method of the old version of IE is different. It is recommended to use box-sizing:border-box in a unified manner; 3. Flexbox and Grid perform differently in edge cases or in old versions. More tests and use Autoprefixer; 4. Some CSS attribute behaviors are inconsistent. CanIuse must be consulted and downgraded.
