Proof of Work (PoW) ensures safety through computing power competition, but has high energy consumption and slow speed; 2. Proof of Stake (PoS) determines the accounting rights by holding currency weight, reducing energy consumption and improving efficiency, but there is a risk that "the richer is richer"; 3. Delegated Proof of Stake (DPoS) achieves high-speed transactions and low energy consumption through voting and election of representatives, but has a low degree of decentralization; 4. Proof of Authoritative (PoA) relies on the consensus of trusted nodes and is applicable to license chains, with the highest efficiency but high degree of centralization; these consensus algorithms have jointly shaped the diversity and evolution direction of the virtual currency ecosystem by weighing security, efficiency and decentralization, and have promoted the widespread application of blockchain technology in different scenarios.

In the vast universe of digital currency, blockchain, as its underlying foundation, plays a crucial role in its core consensus algorithm. It is these exquisitely designed algorithms that give virtual currencies the decentralization, security and immutability of features, thus shaping the huge and vibrant virtual currency ecosystem we see today. Imagine that without a reliable mechanism to verify transactions and maintain ledgers, digital currency will be like a castle in the air, and its value and trust will no longer exist. Every iteration and innovation of the consensus algorithm is like adding bricks and tiles to the digital economy, profoundly affecting transaction speed, network security and even the participant structure of the entire market. So, how exactly do these mysterious algorithms work? How can they cleverly condense scattered nodes into a unified and efficient value transmission network? A deep understanding of the operating principles of consensus algorithms is the key to understanding the operating logic of the entire virtual currency ecosystem.

The core concept of blockchain consensus algorithm

The essence of blockchain consensus algorithm is to solve the "Byzantine General Problem" in distributed systems, that is, how to make all honest nodes agree with a certain state when there are malicious nodes or unreliable communications. In traditional centralized systems, central agencies are responsible for maintaining data consistency, while in a decentralized blockchain network, a set of mechanisms is needed to ensure that all participants can reach consensus on the effectiveness, order of transactions and the latest status of the ledger, thereby avoiding the "double spending" problem and ensuring the overall security of the system. Consensus algorithms determine who has the right to keep accounts, how to keep accounts, and how to verify the correctness of accounts, which directly affects the efficiency, security and degree of decentralization of the blockchain network.

Detailed explanation of mainstream blockchain consensus algorithm

The prosperity of the virtual currency ecosystem is inseparable from the support of various consensus algorithms. Each algorithm has its own unique advantages and disadvantages and is suitable for different scenarios. The following will introduce several mainstream consensus algorithms and their working principles in detail.

Proof of Work (PoW)

Proof of Work is the first consensus algorithm adopted by Bitcoin and one of the most well-known consensus mechanisms at present. The core idea of PoW is to prove that you have put in "workload" by calculating a difficult problem, so as to obtain the right to keep a book.

• How it works: The miner competes to solve a complex cryptography puzzle (such as finding a hash value so that it is smaller than a specific target value), and the first miner who finds the answer gets the right to package a new block and add it to the blockchain. This process of solving problems requires a large amount of computing resources and electricity, so it is called "workload".
• Security: The security of PoW mainly depends on computing power. If an attacker wants to tamper with a confirmed transaction, he needs to have more than 51% of the computing power of the entire network to succeed, which is very difficult and extremely costly in practice.
• Decentralization degree: In theory, anyone can participate in mining and maintaining the decentralization of the network.
• Disadvantages:
  • Huge resource consumption: PoW mining requires a large amount of power and computing resources, which has a certain impact on the environment.
  • Slow transaction confirmation speed: Due to the setting of mining k competition and block time interval, transaction confirmation usually takes a long time.
  • There is a risk of centralization: With the emergence of mining K-based specialization and mining pools, computing power may be concentrated in the hands of a few large mining pools.

Proof of Stake (PoS)

Proof of Stake is an alternative to PoW, designed to solve the problems of high energy consumption and inefficiency of PoW. The core idea of PoS is that coin holders obtain accounting rights based on the number of tokens they hold and the time they hold, rather than through computing power.

• How it works: The verifier (or "monitor") gains the right to create new blocks and verify transactions by locking a certain number of tokens as "collateral". The selected verifier is based on factors such as the ratio of currency holding and age of currency, rather than the calculation ability. If a validator does evil (such as double spending), the tokens he or she stakes will be confiscated, which is called a "punishment mechanism".
• Security: The security of PoS depends on economic incentives. The cost of doing evil (loss staked tokens) is much higher than the possible benefits it can earn, thus ensuring network security.
• Decentralization: In theory, anyone holding tokens can become a validator, but big players may have greater influence.
• advantage:
  • Low energy consumption: Compared with PoW, PoS does not rely on a large number of calculations, and its energy consumption is significantly reduced.
  • Fast transaction confirmation speed: Faster transaction confirmation is usually achieved.
  • Higher scalability: It is easier to implement scaling and other scaling technologies.
• shortcoming:
  • "The richer the richer" risk: Users who hold more tokens may gain more profits, and there is a risk of wealth concentration.
  • "Nothing-at-Stake" problem: In some early PoS implementations, if a fork occurs, the validator can verify on both chains without losing anything, increasing the cost of attack. Modern PoS solves this problem through a punishment mechanism.
  • The security is not as verified as PoW: Although PoS is theoretically secure, its long-term security still needs more practical verification.

Delegated Proof of Stake (DPoS)

DPoS is a variant of PoS designed to improve transaction processing speed and throughput while maintaining a certain degree of decentralization. DPoS introduces the concept of “representative” or “witnesses”, which is voted for by token holders.

• How it works: Token holders delegate their voting rights to a few delegates (usually 21-100) who are responsible for verifying transactions and generating blocks. If the delegates perform poorly or do evil, they can be removed from the vote.
• advantage:
  • Fast transaction speed and high throughput: Due to the limited number of validators, network consensus efficiency is high.
  • Easily upgrade and governance: Delegate voting allows for more flexibility in protocol upgrades and decision-making.
  • Very low energy consumption: Similar to PoS, it does not depend on a large number of computing.
• shortcoming:
  • The risk of centralization is higher: a few representatives have the right to keep their books. Although they can be voting, the degree of decentralization is lower than that of PoW and PoS.
  • "Rent-seeking" issue: Representatives may engage in unjust competition or transfer of interests in order to obtain a vote.

Proof of Authority (PoA)

PoA is a consensus algorithm suitable for licensed chains or alliance chains, and its trust basis lies in a set of pre-authorized and trusted nodes.

• How it works: Only authorized and verified nodes can create new blocks and verify transactions. These nodes are usually entities with real identities and trusted.
• advantage:
  • Extremely fast transaction speed: no complex calculations or large-scale voting is required, and the consensus efficiency is the highest.
  • Very low energy consumption: similar to PoS and DPoS.
  • Good fault tolerance: When a few nodes in the network have problems, the system can still run normally.
  • Suitable for licensing chains: Outstanding in enterprise-level applications that require strong supervision and high efficiency.
• shortcoming:
  • The highest degree of centralization: The security of the network depends entirely on the trust of a few authorized nodes, and if these nodes collude to do evil, the system will crash.
  • Not applicable to public chains: the centralized characteristics are contrary to the decentralized spirit of public chains.

How consensus algorithms shape virtual currency ecosystem

Different consensus algorithms profoundly affect all aspects of the virtual currency ecosystem, including its performance, security, governance model and user experience.

• Transaction speed and scalability: The transaction confirmation speed of PoW chain is slow, such as Bitcoin can only process several transactions per second, which limits its application in large-scale payment scenarios. Algorithms such as PoS, DPoS and PoA can achieve higher transaction throughput, providing possibilities for emerging applications such as DeFi and NFT. Ethereum switched from PoW to PoS (ETH 2.0) to solve its network congestion and high gas fees, thereby improving overall scalability.
• Security and Decentralization: PoW's security has been tested for the longest time, and its decentralized nature makes it difficult to control by a single entity. However, PoS ensures security through economic incentives while reducing energy consumption. DPoS and PoA sacrifice part of decentralization for efficiency, but they still have unique advantages in specific scenarios. The choice of consensus algorithm directly determines the trade-off between the decentralized ideal and the actual centralized risk of a blockchain project.
• Energy consumption and environmental impact: PoW's high energy consumption has always been controversial, while PoS and other non-mining K consensus algorithms significantly reduce energy consumption, making them more attractive at a time when environmental awareness is increasing. This improvement in energy efficiency will undoubtedly help promote the virtual currency to gain wider social recognition.
• Developer Ecology and Application Scenarios: A high-performance, low-cost consensus algorithm can often attract more developers to build applications on it. For example, BSC (PoSA-based BNB Chain) attracts a large number of DeFi projects and users due to its low transaction fees and high throughput. The characteristics of different consensus algorithms determine their most suitable application scenarios. For example, PoW is suitable for currencies that emphasize security and value storage, while PoS and DPoS are more suitable for smart contract platforms that require high throughput.
• Governance model and community participation: Many consensus algorithms, especially DPoS, directly affect the governance structure of blockchain projects. Token holders vote to participate in decision-making. This on-chain governance model allows the community to participate more directly in the future development of the project, thereby enhancing user stickiness and ecological vitality. For example, some projects are updated and parameter adjustments that require community voting.

Ranking of mainstream virtual currency exchanges in the world

The evolution of consensus algorithms has also indirectly promoted the prosperity of the virtual currency trading market, because more efficient and secure blockchain networks can attract more assets and users. Here are several mainstream virtual currency exchanges worldwide (ranked in no particular order, based only on their influence in the global market and user base):

1. Binance

• One of the world's largest cryptocurrency trading platforms.
• Provides a wide range of transaction pairs and financial services.
• Have strong liquidity and user base.
• Actively plan the blockchain ecosystem, such as BNB Chain.

2. OKX

• An old cryptocurrency trading platform.
• Provides a variety of trading products such as spot, contracts, options, etc.
• Have a complete risk control system.
• Committed to Web3 technology and ecological construction.

3. Huobi (HTX)

• A historic cryptocurrency exchange.
• Have a large number of users worldwide.
• Provide a wealth of digital asset trading services.
• Continuously explore innovative business models.

The above is the detailed content of Blockchain consensus algorithm, how to shape the virtual currency ecosystem. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!