CSS性能最優(yōu)的通常是ID和類選擇器。1.ID選擇器最快，因唯一性使瀏覽器查找后立即停止，適合單一樣式應(yīng)用；2.類選擇器平衡且可復(fù)用，適用于大多數(shù)樣式任務(wù)；3.避免過度嵌套或復(fù)雜選擇器（如偽類、屬性選擇器），因其解析較慢，尤其在大型項(xiàng)目中影響性能。優(yōu)先使用簡單選擇器以提升渲染效率并保持代碼可維護(hù)性。

When it comes to CSS performance, most modern browsers are highly optimized, so the differences between selectors aren't usually a big concern for everyday websites. But if you're working on large-scale projects or aiming for optimal rendering performance, some CSS selectors do perform better than others — mostly because of how browsers process them.

In general, simple selectors like class and ID selectors are the most performant, while complex or deeply nested selectors can introduce unnecessary overhead.

ID Selectors Are Fastest (Mostly Because They’re Unique)

Browsers treat ID selectors (#header) as unique identifiers. Since each ID is supposed to appear only once per page, the browser can optimize by stopping its search after finding the first match.

This makes #some-id extremely fast compared to other selector types.

Best use:

• For one-off styles that need to be applied to a single element.
• Avoid overusing IDs for styling — they’re hard to override and not very reusable.

Note: Don’t rely on ID selectors just for speed unless you really need them. Performance gains here are negligible in most cases.

Class Selectors Are the Workhorse — Balanced and Reusable

Class selectors (.btn, .active) are the go-to choice for most styling tasks. Browsers are also heavily optimized for them, making them nearly as fast as ID selectors.

They offer:

• Reusability across multiple elements
• Good performance
• Easier maintenance and overrides

Tips for performance:

• Use semantic class names that describe purpose, not style (e.g., .nav-link instead of .blue-text)
• Avoid chaining too many classes together unnecessarily (like .btn.primary.large.success), especially if it's not needed for specificity

Avoid Overly Complex Selectors

Selectors like div ul li a span or section > div:nth-child(2) .highlight may work fine visually, but they take longer for the browser to parse and match.

Why?

• The browser reads selectors from right to left.
• So div ul li a span starts with matching all span elements, then checks if they're inside an a, which is inside an li, and so on — which can get slow if used excessively.

Examples of what to avoid or minimize:

• Deep nesting like body div header nav ul li a
• Heavy use of pseudo-classes like :nth-child(n) in large lists
• Universal selector (*) combined with attribute selectors

If you find yourself writing long chains or deep nesting, consider adding a simple class instead.

Attribute and Pseudo-Class Selectors Are Slower but Still Useful

Selectors like [type="text"], :hover, or input:checked are more expensive because they require additional checks beyond element type or class.

They're not slow enough to break your site, but overuse — especially in large forms or dynamic interfaces — can add up.

Use these when:

• You need to target specific states or attributes (like form validation)
• When JavaScript-driven styles depend on dynamic values

But again, prefer adding a class via JS if you're toggling visual states — it’s faster and easier to maintain.

So, the most performant CSS selectors are simple ones like ID and class selectors. More complex selectors have their place, but they come with a small cost in processing time. Unless you're building something huge or performance-critical, this won't make a visible difference — but knowing how selectors work helps write cleaner, more scalable code.

基本上就這些。

以上是哪些CSS選擇器是表現(xiàn)最多的，為什么？的詳細(xì)內(nèi)容。更多信息請關(guān)注PHP中文網(wǎng)其他相關(guān)文章！