CSS性能最優(yōu)的通常是ID和類選擇器。 1.ID選擇器最快，因唯一性使瀏覽器查找後立即停止，適合單一樣式應用；2.類選擇器平衡且可複用，適用於大多數(shù)樣式任務；3.避免過度嵌套或複雜選擇器（如偽類、屬性選擇器），因其解析較慢，尤其在大型項目中影響性能。優(yōu)先使用簡單選擇器以提升渲染效率並保持代碼可維護性。

When it comes to CSS performance, most modern browsers are highly optimized, so the differences between selectors aren't usually a big concern for everyday websites. But if you're working on large-scale projects or aiming for optimal rendering performance, some CSS selectors do perform better than others — mostly because of how browsers process them.

In general, simple selectors like class and ID selectors are the most performant , while complex or deeply nested selectors can introduce unnecessary overhead.

ID Selectors Are Fastest (Mostly Because They're Unique)

Browsers treat ID selectors ( #header ) as unique identifiers. Since each ID is supposed to appear only once per page, the browser can optimize by stopping its search after finding the first match.

This makes #some-id extremely fast compared to other selector types.

Best use:

• For one-off styles that need to be applied to a single element.
• Avoid overusing IDs for styling — they're hard to override and not very reusable.

Note: Don't rely on ID selectors just for speed unless you really need them. Performance gains here are negligible in most cases.

Class Selectors Are the Workhorse — Balanced and Reusable

Class selectors ( .btn , .active ) are the go-to choice for most styling tasks. Browsers are also heavily optimized for them, making them nearly as fast as ID selectors.

They offer:

• Reusability across multiple elements
• Good performance
• Easier maintenance and overrides

Tips for performance:

• Use semantic class names that describe purpose, not style (eg, .nav-link instead of .blue-text )
• Avoid chaining too many classes together unnecessarily (like .btn.primary.large.success ), especially if it's not needed for specificity

Avoid Overly Complex Selectors

Selectors like div ul li a span or section > div:nth-child(2) .highlight may work fine visually, but they take longer for the browser to parse and match.

Why?

• The browser reads selectors from right to left.
• So div ul li a span starts with matching all span elements, then checks if they're inside an a , which is inside an li , and so on — which can get slow if used excessively.

Examples of what to avoid or minimize:

• Deep nesting like body div header nav ul li a
• Heavy use of pseudo-classes like :nth-child(n) in large lists
• Universal selector ( * ) combined with attribute selectors

If you find yourself writing long chains or deep nesting, consider adding a simple class instead.

Attribute and Pseudo-Class Selectors Are Slower but Still Useful

Selectors like [type="text"] , :hover , or input:checked are more expensive because they require additional checks beyond element type or class.

They're not slow enough to break your site , but overuse — especially in large forms or dynamic interfaces — can add up.

Use these when:

• You need to target specific states or attributes (like form validation)
• When JavaScript-driven styles depend on dynamic values

But again, prefer adding a class via JS if you're toggling visual states — it's faster and easier to maintain.

So, the most performant CSS selectors are simple ones like ID and class selectors. More complex selectors have their place, but they come with a small cost in processing time. Unless you're building something huge or performance-critical, this won't make a visible difference — but knowing how selectors work helps write cleaner, more scalable code.

基本上就這些。

以上是哪些CSS選擇器是表現(xiàn)最多的，為什麼？的詳細內(nèi)容。更多資訊請關(guān)注PHP中文網(wǎng)其他相關(guān)文章！