Spring Data JPA has high development efficiency and simple code, which is suitable for rapid construction of CRUD applications; 2. JDBC has better performance, fine granularity control, and is suitable for high-performance and large-data scenarios; 3. JPA transaction management and testability are more convenient, and JDBC requires more manual configuration; 4. It is recommended to use JPA in rapid development, use JDBC in performance critical paths or complex SQL scenarios. Actual projects can adopt a hybrid mode to take into account development efficiency and operation performance.

In Java application development, data access is one of the core links. When facing database operations, developers often choose between Spring Data JPA and JDBC . Both have their own advantages and applicable scenarios, and understanding their differences can help make more appropriate technical decisions.

1. Abstract hierarchy and development efficiency

Spring Data JPA is a high-level abstraction based on JPA (Java Persistence API), which greatly simplifies the development of the data access layer.

• You just need to define an interface to inherit JpaRepository and you can automatically obtain common CRUD operations:

  

   public interface UserRepository extends JpaRepository<User, Long> {
  }

  The above line of code has methods such as save() , findAll() , deleteById() , etc.

• Supports automatic parsing of method names (such as findByEmailAndName ) without writing SQL.

  

• Entity mapping is completed by annotation (such as @Entity , @Id ) and is close to object-oriented thinking.

In contrast, JDBC is the underlying API that directly interacts with the database.

• SQL statements need to be written manually.
• Each query requires processing of Connection , PreparedStatement , ResultSet and other resources.
• The sample code is more cumbersome:

   String sql = "SELECT * FROM users WHERE id = ?";
  try (PreparedStatement stmt = connection.prepareStatement(sql)) {
      stmt.setLong(1, id);
      ResultSet rs = stmt.executeQuery();
      while (rs.next()) {
          // Manually map fields to object}
  }

? Conclusion : Spring Data JPA is faster to develop and concise in code; JDBC is more cumbersome but has stronger control.

2. Performance and control of particle size

Although JPA improves development efficiency, JDBC has more advantages in performance-sensitive scenarios.

• SQL Control : Using JDBC, you can accurately optimize each SQL, including index usage, connection method, batch insertion, etc.
• Avoid N 1 queries : JPA is prone to unexpected multiple queries due to lazy loading, while in JDBC you can write efficient JOIN queries at one time.
• Resource overhead : JPA frameworks (such as Hibernate) have mechanisms such as cache, dirty checking, object state management, etc., which brings additional memory and CPU overhead; JDBC has almost no runtime overhead.

For example:

If you need to search 100,000 pieces of data from the order table and user table and export it, write an efficient JOIN query in JDBC and stream it, it will save more resources than loading a large number of entity objects in JPA.

? Suitable for scenarios :

• JDBC: Reporting system, high concurrent writes, and large data processing.
• JPA: CRUD application with complex business logic but moderate data volume.

3. Testability and transaction management

The Spring ecosystem has good support for both, but the experience is slightly different.

• Transaction Management : Spring's @Transactional annotation works in both JPA and JDBC, which is more naturally integrated into declarative transactions.
• Test convenience :
  • JPA can perform integration testing with H2 memory database, automatically build tables, and quickly verify.
  • JDBC testing requires preparing SQL scripts or manually mocking data sources, which is a bit troublesome.
• Repository layer decoupling : JPA's interface design is easier to implement dependency inversion, which is conducive to unit testing.

However, JDBC can also reduce boilerplate code through tool classes such as JdbcTemplate or SimpleJdbcInsert to improve maintainability.

4. When to choose which one?

summary

• Spring Data JPA is suitable for modern applications that pursue development efficiency and clear structure , especially in Spring Boot projects, which are almost standard.
• JDBC is suitable for scenarios with high performance and SQL control requirements . Although there is more code, it is more transparent and controllable.

In actual projects, there is no need to choose one of two. Many systems use hybrid mode :
The main business is developed rapidly with JPA, and the key performance paths are optimized with JDBC.

Basically all this is it, and flexible choices are the key according to team capabilities, project stages and performance requirements.

The above is the detailed content of Spring Data JPA vs JDBC in Java Applications. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!