He declared the dawn of a “golden age of America,” energizing the crowd with chants of “Drill, baby, drill and build, baby, build!” and calling on U.S. tech firms to go “all in for America.” The president unveiled an executive order banning what he labeled as woke AI—prompting immediate controversy over how government should influence the ethical foundations of artificial intelligence. Trump also pushed for faster approvals for data centers and energy infrastructure, and introduced a new push to transform the United States into an “AI export powerhouse.”

A Tech-Centric Blueprint for AI Dominance

The president laid out a comprehensive strategy to elevate America’s position in the global AI race, centered on empowering private enterprise through deregulation, financial incentives, and diplomatic efforts to open foreign markets. He urged Congress to clarify copyright laws so AI systems can train on publicly accessible content without being hindered by restrictive licensing.

Trump advocated for a unified federal standard for AI regulation, warning that a patchwork of state-level rules could stifle innovation and burden startups and small businesses. He emphasized that innovation should be driven by the private sector, not government mandates, and insisted that Washington’s role should be to enable progress, not obstruct it—promising to keep regulators “out of the way.”

The plan includes accelerating the development of critical AI infrastructure—data centers, power plants, and semiconductor manufacturing facilities—through streamlined regulations and faster permitting. This initiative ties into a broader push for industrial renewal, with demand surging for skilled labor such as electricians, HVAC technicians, and construction workers. The speech highlighted the One Big Beautiful Bill Act, central to Trump’s second-term agenda, which combines tax reductions, spending reforms, and a raised debt ceiling. Notably, it allows businesses to fully deduct capital investments upfront, encouraging rapid private-sector funding for infrastructure.

On the global stage, Trump proposed establishing the U.S. as a leading exporter of full-stack AI solutions—encompassing American-developed models, software applications, and supporting hardware. The goal is to strengthen alliances through technology exports, backed by active support from the State Department and the Department of Commerce.

In terms of energy, he endorsed an “all of the above” approach—tapping coal, oil, gas, and nuclear power to meet the soaring electricity needs of AI operations. According to the Energy Information Administration, China generated more than double the energy of the U.S. in 2023. This energy surplus enables China to operate massive AI facilities, even with less efficient chips like older Nvidia models or domestically produced semiconductors from Huawei.

Trump vowed to purge what he described as woke mandates from federally funded AI projects, criticizing previous policies that tied federal support to diversity and inclusion targets. While President Biden’s semiconductor strategy encouraged broader hiring practices, Trump’s new executive order would prohibit the government from using AI systems that include ideological filters or enforce DEI metrics.

Finally, Trump stated his commitment to supporting small tech companies, arguing that innovation must not be monopolized by a handful of dominant firms. “The future of AI shouldn’t be controlled by just a few corporations,” he said.

Reactions to the AI Initiative Are Divided

Skeptics argue the plan primarily benefits established tech giants while weakening democratic oversight and public accountability. Nicholas Garcia, senior policy counsel at Public Knowledge, described it as “a giveaway to powerful, entrenched tech corporations.”

The focus on deregulation and rapid project approvals has alarmed environmental groups, who warn of the climate consequences tied to massive data centers and fossil fuel-dependent energy expansion. Civil society organizations have responded with the “People’s AI Action Plan,” a counter-manifesto asserting that “We cannot allow lobbyists from Big Tech and Big Oil to dictate the rules of AI and our economy at the cost of our freedom and equality.”

Privacy and civil liberties advocates are also raising concerns. The ban on “woke AI” and proposed rollback of misinformation safeguards have been criticized by digital rights experts. The Electronic Privacy Information Center warned the policy “prioritizes corporate interests over consumer safety.”

“Government pushing AI that only promotes free speech makes me uneasy,” said Manasi Vartak, chief AI architect at Cloudera. “In an era of rampant misinformation, where AI is increasingly a primary source of information, the free speech argument can be dangerously exploited.” At the same time, she welcomed the administration’s endorsement of open-source models and open-weight datasets, calling them vital for ongoing innovation and research.

The Political Landscape of AI Governance

Trump’s AI vision follows a classic Silicon Valley playbook: reduce red tape, invest heavily in infrastructure, and let market forces drive results.

While bold in scope, much of the plan remains a high-level framework, leaving implementation to federal agencies and legislative action. Its real-world impact will hinge on whether civil society can move from the sidelines into meaningful participation. As rules and funding priorities take shape, there’s a risk of policies tilting toward partisan interests.

Yet this moment also presents an opportunity for innovative governance models that transcend the traditional debate between strict regulation and hands-off laissez-faire approaches. Experts are urging hybrid systems that combine public-private collaboration with independent audits and adaptive oversight capable of evolving alongside fast-moving AI technologies. A report from Fathom, an independent nonprofit, cautions that “no matter how noble a government’s intentions may be, direct regulation often lags behind innovation—and worse, it can crush it.”

The success of this AI agenda will shape not only U.S. competitiveness but also the global norms governing artificial intelligence. As other nations advance their own strategies, the effectiveness of Trump’s private-sector-first model will be put to the test. The plan positions America to lead in technological advancement and global adoption. But in the end, its triumph will depend on whether people worldwide choose to trust and adopt AI made in America.

The above is the detailed content of AI Action Plan Channels Rally Energy, Ignites U.S. Policy Debate. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!